Comparison Overview

Shaw Reynolds Lawyers

VS

Coash Court Reporting and Video

Shaw Reynolds Lawyers

Chifley Tower, 2 Chifley Square, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Shaw Reynolds Lawyers are at the forefront of developing legal solutions for our clients. Our Lawyers are experienced litigation and advisory specialists, providing services to clients of all sizes including all levels of government, private corporations and individuals. Our Lawyers practice in various Courts and Tribunals and assist our clients with managing legal risks in relation to property development, land use planning and environmental matters.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coash Court Reporting and Video

1802 N. 7th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Phoenix-based, Coash Court Reporting & Video, offers court reporting and videography services to law firms, agencies, and businesses nationwide. Our services include mobile videoconferencing, transcription services, interactive streaming, electronic transcripts, remote and/or realtime depositions, and access to an online repository. For 40+ years, we have partnered with a multitude of firms and agencies, facilitating their litigation and record-keeping needs. Scheduling a deposition is easy with our 24/7 nationwide scheduling service. With our state-of-the-art technology, resources, and experience, we stand apart from other court reporting companies, making it easier for you to win your case.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-reynolds-lawwyers.jpeg
Shaw Reynolds Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coash-&-coash.jpeg
Coash Court Reporting and Video
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shaw Reynolds Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coash Court Reporting and Video
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shaw Reynolds Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coash Court Reporting and Video in 2025.

Incident History — Shaw Reynolds Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shaw Reynolds Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coash Court Reporting and Video (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coash Court Reporting and Video cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-reynolds-lawwyers.jpeg
Shaw Reynolds Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coash-&-coash.jpeg
Coash Court Reporting and Video
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company and Coash Court Reporting and Video company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Coash Court Reporting and Video company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company.

In the current year, Coash Court Reporting and Video company and Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coash Court Reporting and Video company nor Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coash Court Reporting and Video company nor Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coash Court Reporting and Video company nor Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company nor Coash Court Reporting and Video company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company nor Coash Court Reporting and Video company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Coash Court Reporting and Video company employs more people globally than Shaw Reynolds Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shaw Reynolds Lawyers nor Coash Court Reporting and Video holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X