Comparison Overview

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea

VS

Canton Museum of Art

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea

9811 Seaport Pl, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 4X3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Visit Canada's community aquarium and learning centre for the Salish Sea. Experience 160 species of marine life, a marine mammal artifact exhibit, and an inspirational Coast Salish art collection. Connect with our Oceaneers, learn about, explore and conserve our Salish Sea Bioregion – its wildlife, waters, land, culture, and people. As a not-for-profit community organization, the Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea connects the public with the Salish Sea Bioregion and its ecosystems through engagement, knowledge and awareness. This one-of-a-kind aquarium and cultural centre offers an interactive, informative and hands-on experience with the Salish Sea through self-guided visits, daily programs, group and school bookings, and special events and lectures.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Canton Museum of Art

1001 Market Ave N, Canton, Ohio, 44702-1075, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Canton Museum of Art is recognized for powerful original exhibitions and national touring exhibitions focused on American art – and making the discovery and exploration of art accessible to all. The Museum’s education outreach programs, classes, and workshops serve thousands of students of all ages. CMA’s collection focuses on American works on paper, primarily watercolors, and contemporary ceramics. Founded in 1935, CMA is one of three museums in Stark County accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and serves more than 45,000 visitors each year. Visit cantonart.org to learn more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-ocean-discovery-centre.jpeg
Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canton-museum-of-art.jpeg
Canton Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Canton Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canton Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Canton Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canton Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaw-ocean-discovery-centre.jpeg
Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canton-museum-of-art.jpeg
Canton Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company and Canton Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Canton Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company.

In the current year, Canton Museum of Art company and Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Canton Museum of Art company nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Canton Museum of Art company nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Canton Museum of Art company nor Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company nor Canton Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company nor Canton Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Canton Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shaw Centre for the Salish Sea nor Canton Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X