Comparison Overview

Sharp HealthCare

VS

Aster DM Healthcare

Sharp HealthCare

8695 Spectrum Center Blvd., None, San Diego, CA, US, 92123
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Sharp HealthCare is a not-for-profit health care system based in San Diego, California, with four acute care hospitals, three specialty hospitals, three medical groups and a health plan. We provide medical services in virtually all fields of medicine, including primary care, heart care, cancer, orthopedics, stroke/neurology, women’s health, rehabilitation, robotic surgery, bariatric surgery, chemical dependency and behavioral health. Sharp sets the community standard for exceptional care. Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center, Sharp Grossmont Hospital and Sharp Memorial Hospital have received the prestigious Magnet recognition by the American Nurses Credentialing Center for excellence in nursing practices and quality patient care. At the heart of our organization are more than 20,000 nurses, staff, affiliated physicians, and volunteers who are on a journey to make health care better for our patients and their families. It’s what we call The Sharp Experience – treating each person with dignity, compassion and respect, and using our clinical excellence and advanced technology to deliver the highest-quality patient care. We are dedicated to transforming the health care experience by making Sharp the best place to work, the best place to practice medicine and the best place to receive care in San Diego.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Aster DM Healthcare

AE
Last Update: 2025-12-09

From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 400+ medical establishments, including 15 hospitals, 120 clinics and 307 pharmacies in GCC and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthcare authority across the Middle East. Currently one of the largest and fastest growing conglomerates in the MENA region, Aster DM Healthcare covers the full spectrum of healthcare services. An expansive portfolio includes hospitals and clinics, pharmacies, diagnostic centres, educational institutions, healthcare management and healthcare support systems. Headquartered in Dubai, the Aster DM network now encompasses more than 19,657 employees( Doctors, Nurses, Others) with JCI accredited clinics and diagnostic centres. Never content to rest on its laurels, Aster DM Healthcare is constantly seeking opportunities to set new yardsticks with advanced developments. With many more innovative and ambitious initiatives, Aster DM Healthcare has radically catalyzed the healthcare revolution across Middle East Each of the Group’s verticals is a symbol of distinction, driven by the commitment to build a healthier tomorrow and to take healthcare to the next level of excellence.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 18,560
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharp-healthcare.jpeg
Sharp HealthCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asterdmhealthcare.jpeg
Aster DM Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sharp HealthCare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aster DM Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharp HealthCare in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aster DM Healthcare in 2025.

Incident History — Sharp HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharp HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aster DM Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aster DM Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharp-healthcare.jpeg
Sharp HealthCare
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asterdmhealthcare.jpeg
Aster DM Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aster DM Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sharp HealthCare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sharp HealthCare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aster DM Healthcare company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aster DM Healthcare company and Sharp HealthCare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor Sharp HealthCare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sharp HealthCare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Aster DM Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor Sharp HealthCare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sharp HealthCare company nor Aster DM Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aster DM Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sharp HealthCare company.

Aster DM Healthcare company employs more people globally than Sharp HealthCare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sharp HealthCare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N