Comparison Overview

Sharlot Hall Museum

VS

Victoria and Albert Museum

Sharlot Hall Museum

415 W. Gurley Street, Prescott, Arizona, 86301, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sharlothallmuseum.org

The Sharlot Hall Museum, founded in 1928 by visionary Sharlot M. Hall, is an open-air museum in downtown Prescott, Arizona. The four-acre campus includes several historic buildings, including the 1864 Territorial Governor's Mansion, as well as expansive exhibits and gardens. Regular events and programs include the annual Prescott Indian Art Market, premier winetasting event Sharlot's WineFest, monthly Living History Adventures, a popular lecture series, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Victoria and Albert Museum

Cromwell Road, London, undefined, SW7 2RL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vam.ac.uk

The V&A is the world’s leading museum of art and design with collections unrivaled in their scope and diversity. It was established to make works of art available to all and to inspire British designers and manufacturers. Today, the V&A’s collections, which span over 5000 years of human creativity in virtually every medium and from many parts of the world, continue to intrigue, inspire and inform.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,284
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-and-albert-museum.jpeg
Victoria and Albert Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sharlot Hall Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Victoria and Albert Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sharlot Hall Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victoria and Albert Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Sharlot Hall Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sharlot Hall Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Victoria and Albert Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victoria and Albert Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sharlot-hall-museum.jpeg
Sharlot Hall Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-and-albert-museum.jpeg
Victoria and Albert Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Victoria and Albert Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sharlot Hall Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Victoria and Albert Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sharlot Hall Museum company.

In the current year, Victoria and Albert Museum company and Sharlot Hall Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Victoria and Albert Museum company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Victoria and Albert Museum company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Victoria and Albert Museum company nor Sharlot Hall Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum company nor Victoria and Albert Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Victoria and Albert Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sharlot Hall Museum company.

Victoria and Albert Museum company employs more people globally than Sharlot Hall Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sharlot Hall Museum nor Victoria and Albert Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References