Comparison Overview

Shakespeare & Company

VS

Big hART

Shakespeare & Company

70 Kemble St, Lenox, MA, 01240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.shakespeare.org/

The mission of Shakespeare & Company is to deliver a sustainable and vital program of Performance, Training, and Education, integrated for the deepened experience of the artists, the audience, the Company, and the community. We embrace the core values of Shakespeare’s work: collaboration, commitment to language, visceral experience, and classical ideals, expressed with physical prowess and an embodied contemporary voice.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Big hART

Little Goldie St, Wynyard, Tasmania, AU, 7325
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://bighart.org

Big hART is Australia’s leading arts campaigning organisation, telling Australia’s most invisible stories. Founded in NW Tasmania in 1992, Big hART has now worked with over 64 communities in regional, remote and urban Australia to great acclaim winning 47 awards from Helpmanns to Myer and AFI Awards. We make art, build community and drive change, exposing injustice through powerful campaigns. We use film, theatre, documentary, events, music, podcasts, apps, digital media, augmented and virtual reality to tell powerful stories which ensure that the voice of the powerless influences decision makers. No issue is too hard. Our projects haven driven change in homelessness, addiction, slavery at sea, domestic violence, inequality and intergenerational injustice faced by Indigenous Australians. We initiated and ran the 8 year campaign for copyright justice for Albert Namatjira’s family which saw copyright handed back to the family in 2017. We enable young women to be change-makers in family violence hotspots. We work with isolated communities and prisons and deliver exceptional community driven solutions which are proven, evidence based, long term and innovative.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shakespeare-&-company.jpeg
Shakespeare & Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-hart.jpeg
Big hART
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shakespeare & Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Big hART
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shakespeare & Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big hART in 2025.

Incident History — Shakespeare & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shakespeare & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Big hART (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big hART cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shakespeare-&-company.jpeg
Shakespeare & Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-hart.jpeg
Big hART
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shakespeare & Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Big hART company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Big hART company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shakespeare & Company company.

In the current year, Big hART company and Shakespeare & Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Big hART company nor Shakespeare & Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Big hART company nor Shakespeare & Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Big hART company nor Shakespeare & Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shakespeare & Company company nor Big hART company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shakespeare & Company company nor Big hART company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shakespeare & Company company employs more people globally than Big hART company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shakespeare & Company nor Big hART holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References