Comparison Overview

Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill

VS

Katonah Museum of Art

Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill

3501 Lexington Rd, Harrodsburg, 40330, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill is a landmark destination that shares 3,000 acres of discovery in the spirit of the Kentucky Shakers. With 34 original Shaker structures, the site is home to the country’s largest private collection of original 19th century buildings and is the largest National Historic Landmark in Kentucky. This nonprofit 501 (c)(3) organization encompasses The Inn, The Trustees' Table restaurant, Craft Shops, The Historic Centre with museum exhibitions and guided programs, The Farm, The Preserve and a number of other event venues and guest services.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Katonah Museum of Art

134 Jay St, Katonah, New York, 10536, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Accredited by the American Association of Museums, the Katonah Museum of Art originates ten to twelve exhibitions annually, covering a broad range of art and humanities topics. From the beginning, the KMA was committed to presenting exceptional art from all cultures and time periods. The founders’ decision to be a non-collecting institution resulted in a dynamic and flexible exhibition program, which remains one of the most distinctive features of the KMA. The KMA offers lectures, films, workshops, concerts and other events for a general audience; and presents innovative and substantive programs for over 100 member schools. Our Learning Center is the only interactive space in Westchester County where children can come on a daily basis to explore and create art. Our outreach programs for the local Hispanic immigrant population are at the forefront of community-based education programs. The KMA works intensively with schools and service organizations to develop literacy and assimilation skills among this population. Annual attendance is approximately 40,000 people.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaker-village-of-pleasant-hill.jpeg
Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/katonah-museum-of-art.jpeg
Katonah Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Katonah Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Katonah Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Katonah Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Katonah Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shaker-village-of-pleasant-hill.jpeg
Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/katonah-museum-of-art.jpeg
Katonah Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Katonah Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Katonah Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company.

In the current year, Katonah Museum of Art company and Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Katonah Museum of Art company nor Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Katonah Museum of Art company nor Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Katonah Museum of Art company nor Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company nor Katonah Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company nor Katonah Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill company employs more people globally than Katonah Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill nor Katonah Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H