Comparison Overview

ShadowLight Productions

VS

Florida Grand Opera

ShadowLight Productions

22 Chattanooga Street, San Francisco, CA, 94114, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.shadowlight.org

ShadowLight Productions was founded in 1972 by theatre artist, filmmaker and shadow master, Larry Reed, to nurture indigenous shadow theater traditions and to explore and expand the possibilities of the shadow theatre medium by creating innovative interdisciplinary, multicultural works. Our mission is to expose the general public to shadow theater and other art forms. The means of providing such exposure includes but are not limited to live performances, educational programming, film and other media. Honoring the traditional form of shadow theatre while innovating through the use of contemporary methods and interdisciplinary approaches.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Florida Grand Opera

8390 NW 25 Street, Miami, FL, 33122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.FGO.org

Florida Grand Opera (FGO), America’s seventh-oldest opera company, has served the communities of Miami-Dade and Broward Counties since its founding as the Opera Guild of Greater Miami by Arturo di Filippi in 1941. Today, under the leadership of General Director and CEO Susan T. Danis, Florida Grand Opera (FGO) is one of the Southeast’s most vibrant performing arts organizations, presenting a mainstage season of inspiring artistic depth and breadth. Over the past year, the FGO has received outstanding reviews from Opera News, Opera UK, Opera Canada, Opera Now, and a myriad of other opera publications. Serving two substantial regional patron bases, the FGO performs at major theaters in both locations: the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts Ziff Ballet Opera House in Miami, and the Broward Center for the Performing Arts Au-Rene Theatre in Fort Lauderdale. Florida Grand Opera is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shadowlight-productions.jpeg
ShadowLight Productions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-grand-opera.jpeg
Florida Grand Opera
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ShadowLight Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Grand Opera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ShadowLight Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Grand Opera in 2025.

Incident History — ShadowLight Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShadowLight Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Grand Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Grand Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shadowlight-productions.jpeg
ShadowLight Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-grand-opera.jpeg
Florida Grand Opera
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ShadowLight Productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida Grand Opera company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Florida Grand Opera company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ShadowLight Productions company.

In the current year, Florida Grand Opera company and ShadowLight Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Florida Grand Opera company nor ShadowLight Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Florida Grand Opera company nor ShadowLight Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida Grand Opera company nor ShadowLight Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ShadowLight Productions company nor Florida Grand Opera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ShadowLight Productions company nor Florida Grand Opera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Grand Opera company employs more people globally than ShadowLight Productions company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ShadowLight Productions nor Florida Grand Opera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References