Comparison Overview

SFJAZZ

VS

Lyric Theatre

SFJAZZ

201 Franklin St., None, San Francisco, CA, US, 94102
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.sfjazz.org

SFJAZZ is one of the world’s most popular and important presenters of jazz. The SFJAZZ Center is a beautiful and perfect stage for jazz artists and the community to celebrate the living American art form of jazz. The $64 million dollar Center launched in 2013 and the 32 year old non-profit organization now crafts distinguished Programming and Education services from the heart of the San Francisco arts district.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Lyric Theatre

214 W 43rd St, New York, New York, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lyricbroadway.com/

Built over the foundations of the original Lyric (1903; 1,261 seats) and Apollo (1920; 1,194 seats) Theatres, today’s Lyric Theatre combines architectural preservation with state-of-the-art construction and technology. The spirit and character of New York’s grandest historic theatres have been maintained and united with the technical amenities of a modern facility. The Lyric Theatre underwent a complete redesign and transformation for the North American premiere of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, which opened on April 22, 2018 and has since called the Lyric its Broadway home.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sfjazz.jpeg
SFJAZZ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyricbroadway.jpeg
Lyric Theatre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SFJAZZ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lyric Theatre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SFJAZZ in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyric Theatre in 2025.

Incident History — SFJAZZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFJAZZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lyric Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyric Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sfjazz.jpeg
SFJAZZ
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyricbroadway.jpeg
Lyric Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lyric Theatre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SFJAZZ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SFJAZZ company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lyric Theatre company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lyric Theatre company and SFJAZZ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

SFJAZZ company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lyric Theatre company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lyric Theatre company nor SFJAZZ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lyric Theatre company nor SFJAZZ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SFJAZZ company nor Lyric Theatre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lyric Theatre company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SFJAZZ company.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SFJAZZ nor Lyric Theatre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References