Comparison Overview

SFFILM

VS

Terminal Postproducción

SFFILM

39 Mesa St., Suite 110, San Francisco, CA, US, 94129
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Presenter of the San Francisco International Film Festival, SFFILM is a year-round nonprofit organization delivering screenings and events to more than 100,000 film lovers and media education programs to more than 10,000 students and teachers annually. In addition to its public programs, SFFILM supports the careers of hundreds of independent filmmakers from the Bay Area and beyond with grants, residencies, and other creative development services.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Terminal Postproducción

Baja California 165 P2, Cuauhtémoc, 06760, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Terminal es una casa postproductora de vanguardia digital mexicana e independiente, fundada en 2007 por Øyvind Stiauren y Joakim Ziegler. A lo largo de seis años, Terminal se ha posicionado como uno de los principales proveedores de servicios y consultoría de postproducción para el cine mexicano. Trabajamos con procesos técnicos de alta calidad e innovación digital para proyectos de cine y video. Nuestros proyectos han sido internacionalmente galardonados en los festivales internacionales de cine de mayor prestigio como el Festival de Cine de Cannes, Rotterdam, Roma, Gotemburgo, por mencionar algunos. De igual manera, nuestros proyectos tienen el respaldo y reconocimiento nacional de importantes festivales como los Festivales de Cine de Guadalajara y Morelia.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sffilm.jpeg
SFFILM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/terminal.jpeg
Terminal Postproducción
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SFFILM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Terminal Postproducción
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SFFILM in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Terminal Postproducción in 2025.

Incident History — SFFILM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFFILM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Terminal Postproducción (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Terminal Postproducción cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sffilm.jpeg
SFFILM
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/terminal.jpeg
Terminal Postproducción
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Terminal Postproducción company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SFFILM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Terminal Postproducción company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SFFILM company.

In the current year, Terminal Postproducción company and SFFILM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Terminal Postproducción company nor SFFILM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Terminal Postproducción company nor SFFILM company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Terminal Postproducción company nor SFFILM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SFFILM company nor Terminal Postproducción company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SFFILM company nor Terminal Postproducción company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SFFILM company employs more people globally than Terminal Postproducción company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SFFILM nor Terminal Postproducción holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N