Comparison Overview

SeyfarthLean Consulting

VS

The Partners Group

SeyfarthLean Consulting

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

SeyfarthLean Consulting (SLC) is a legal services consultancy and wholly owned subsidiary of Seyfarth Shaw LLP. SLC partners with legal organizations around the world to address a wide range of issues that require an integrated combination of business, technology and legal knowledge. SLC’s consultants are technologists, business strategists, data analytics specialists and process improvement professionals. Together, they design and build solutions to optimize legal services delivery, law department management and use of inside and outside counsel.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Partners Group

3575 Piedmont Road, Suite 900, Atlanta, GA, US, 30303
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Partners Group is quality legal placement. We are a premier national legal recruiting firm specializing in the permanent and contract placement of attorneys and paralegals with law firms and corporate legal departments nationwide. Former practicing attorneys ourselves, our staff includes former large firm Managing Partners, senior level in-house attorneys, Bar Presidents, Presidents of Young and Women Lawyers Associations, leaders in the National Association of Legal Search Consultants, and law school graduates of Harvard, Duke, U. of Chicago, Emory, Georgia, USC, Tulane, Northwestern, and Berkeley Law, among others. Our legal-practice experience and Bar activity gives us a leg up over other companies without our in-the-trenches knowledge and depth of relationships. We distinguish ourselves not only through outstanding results and top ethical standards, but also by offering a full array of legal placement services. We have offices in Atlanta, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Nashville, Charlotte, Chicago, Columbia, Houston, and Dallas and also serve Seattle, Washington D.C., Miami, and New York.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seyfarthlean-consulting.jpeg
SeyfarthLean Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-partners-group.jpeg
The Partners Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SeyfarthLean Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Partners Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SeyfarthLean Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Partners Group in 2025.

Incident History — SeyfarthLean Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SeyfarthLean Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Partners Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Partners Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seyfarthlean-consulting.jpeg
SeyfarthLean Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-partners-group.jpeg
The Partners Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both SeyfarthLean Consulting company and The Partners Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Partners Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SeyfarthLean Consulting company.

In the current year, The Partners Group company and SeyfarthLean Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Partners Group company nor SeyfarthLean Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Partners Group company nor SeyfarthLean Consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Partners Group company nor SeyfarthLean Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting company nor The Partners Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting company nor The Partners Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Partners Group company employs more people globally than SeyfarthLean Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SeyfarthLean Consulting nor The Partners Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X