Comparison Overview

Settify

VS

Exigent Group Limited

Settify

11/459 Little Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Settify is a global Legal Tech company with headquarters based in Melbourne, Australia. We provide law firms with technology that enables clients to get started online. Clients engage with interactive, conversational online systems, helping them to understand where they stand, the issues they'll face and how their lawyers can assist. Our systems use Artificial Intelligence and Expert systems to intelligently seek all of the client's key background information, which is summarised into a brief for their lawyers. Launched in 2017, Settify has been adopted by hundreds of firms around Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and Canada. It has helped tens of thousands of clients to engage with their lawyers, whose legal concerns total in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Settify has received multiple awards, for innovation, marketing, and technology. We believe that technology will improve the power, efficiency and effectiveness of legal services. Our core philosophy however, is that the relationship of trust between lawyers and clients will always be paramount. We use technology to make the law more human.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Exigent Group Limited

118 Pall Mall, London, London, SW1Y 5ED, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

This page is now Morae. In November 2023, Morae doubled global capacity for managed legal solutions with it's strategic acquistion of Exigent Group Limited. The combined company becomes one of the legal industry’s largest, most experienced providers of technology and managed services. Following the recent merger with Exigent Group, Morae is now the go-to destination for comprehensive legal resources and vibrant community engagement. Join us on Morae's LinkedIn page for a dynamic platform where industry professionals come together to explore emerging trends, share best practices, and engage in thought-provoking discussions. We look forward to seeing you there as we continue to deliver top-notch legal insights and facilitate enriching conversations. https://www.linkedin.com/company/10151555/admin/feed/posts/ Thank you for your continued support, and we can't wait to connect with you on Morae's LinkedIn page! Warm regards, The Team at Morae

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 383
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/settify.jpeg
Settify
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exigent-global.jpeg
Exigent Group Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Settify
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exigent Group Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Settify in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exigent Group Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Settify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Settify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Exigent Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exigent Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/settify.jpeg
Settify
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exigent-global.jpeg
Exigent Group Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Exigent Group Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Settify company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Exigent Group Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Settify company.

In the current year, Exigent Group Limited company and Settify company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exigent Group Limited company nor Settify company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Exigent Group Limited company nor Settify company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Exigent Group Limited company nor Settify company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Settify company nor Exigent Group Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Settify company nor Exigent Group Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Exigent Group Limited company employs more people globally than Settify company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Settify nor Exigent Group Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X