Comparison Overview

SES Automation Inc.

VS

CTi Controltech

SES Automation Inc.

Unit 1 - 1122 Finch Ave. West,, Toronto, ON, M3J 3J5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

SESA Offers a variety of electrical engineering, consulting and system integration services to the manufacturing and process industries. The services include: Feasibility and budget studies - Process diagnostics - Basic and detailed engineering - Various levels of PLC and computer programming - Power distribution, Drives, Automation and Instrumentation system design, supply and commissioning - Installation engineering - Project management - Equipment installations.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CTi Controltech

22 Beta Ct, San Ramon, CA, 94583, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since 1976 CTi Controltech has represented the leading process control and combustion manufacturers. These products, together with our engineering capabilities, give CTi customers high quality solutions to the most difficult industrial applications. CTi is focused on the top quality manufacturers in process control, valves, instrumentation, and combustion. Over the past three decades CTi has continually added and upgraded the quality of companies it represents. Our staff of engineers and technicians is well versed with all our products and are ready to help you with your most demanding applications.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ses-automation-inc-.jpeg
SES Automation Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cti-controltech.jpeg
CTi Controltech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SES Automation Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CTi Controltech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SES Automation Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CTi Controltech in 2025.

Incident History — SES Automation Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SES Automation Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CTi Controltech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CTi Controltech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ses-automation-inc-.jpeg
SES Automation Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cti-controltech.jpeg
CTi Controltech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CTi Controltech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SES Automation Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CTi Controltech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SES Automation Inc. company.

In the current year, CTi Controltech company and SES Automation Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CTi Controltech company nor SES Automation Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CTi Controltech company nor SES Automation Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CTi Controltech company nor SES Automation Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SES Automation Inc. company nor CTi Controltech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CTi Controltech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SES Automation Inc. company.

CTi Controltech company employs more people globally than SES Automation Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SES Automation Inc. nor CTi Controltech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H