Comparison Overview

ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing

VS

LTHD Corporation

ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing

5407 Maple Springs Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14

ServiceMark Communications specializes in printing and marketing services for professional pest control businesses. We offer all types of stock and custom pest control business forms and marketing products. From invoices, service agreements, work orders, statements, wdi reports to brochures, business cards, postcards, sales flyers, promotional product customer giveaways, we've got all of your pest management business marketing and printing needs covered. Call us at 1-866-782-6275 to learn how we can help you grow your pest control business while saving money and developing a consistent brand image.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LTHD Corporation

Strada Ardealului 70, Timişoara, 300154, RO
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We provide label and die cut solutions with durable materials compliant to the latest specific regulations for product identification and traceability. Die cut with industrial materials for specific identification, marking, shielding, thermal & electro-conductive applications. Personalised Static Shielding and Moisture Bags, ESD High Precision Trays, commonly used for packaging applications due to their lower cost tooling, ability to run thin material and large number of design features. We have become a well-known supplier for the electronics manufacturing industry, automotive, aerospace, medical and other industrial sectors, providing a wide range of SMT systems and specialised service support. LTHD Corporation offers full metal sheet services, from design to metal cutting laser technology, covering bending and welding works. Products manufactured according to customer specifications with industry specific materials. The chemical division is dedicated to supporting a wide array of low, medium and high-end processes in multiple industries such as electronic assembly, medical, pharmaceutical, aero-space, automotive, consumer goods and the list could continue. Since 1994, LTHD Corporation has become a well known supplier for the EMS, Automotive, Aerospace, Medical, Logistics and other industrial sectors, providing a wide range of labels, solder materials, cleaning agents, ESD equipment, ID solutions, automation solutions and authorized service support. We offer all of these solutions with a team of more then 100 well trained employees. Our concept is offering to all customers the best solutions for complex applications and complete process support. We are always ready to meet the Customer Requirements with highly qualified teams, focusing on solutions. Quality management systems: SR EN ISO 9001:2015, IATF 16949:2016, AS9100D, AS9120B, ISO 14001:2015, ISO 45001:2018 and ISO 13485:2016.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servicemark-communications-printing-&-marketing.jpeg
ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lthd-corporation.jpeg
LTHD Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LTHD Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LTHD Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LTHD Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LTHD Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servicemark-communications-printing-&-marketing.jpeg
ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lthd-corporation.jpeg
LTHD Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LTHD Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LTHD Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company.

In the current year, LTHD Corporation company and ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LTHD Corporation company nor ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LTHD Corporation company nor ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LTHD Corporation company nor ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company nor LTHD Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company nor LTHD Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LTHD Corporation company employs more people globally than ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ServiceMark Communications Printing & Marketing nor LTHD Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L