Comparison Overview

Serck Global

VS

Griffon Hoverwork Ltd

Serck Global

Unipart House, Garsington Road, Oxford, Select, GB, OX4 6LN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Serck provides specialist design, manufacture, installation, service, and global export of heat transfer technology across a range of sectors and geographies. Our operational capabilities include industrial and marine heat exchangers, climate control and heat recovery products and efficiency coatings, as well as specialist, heavy-duty, high-performance, and heritage automotive radiators. Trusted by a global roster of clients including F1 teams, national utilities, petrochemical producers, military, marine, and rail organisations. Serck is headquartered in the UK with additional facilities in the US and Middle East. Serck is part of the Unipart Group of Companies.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 290
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Griffon Hoverwork Ltd

8 Hazel Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO19 7GB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are the world leader in the design and manufacture of hovercraft and have been involved in hovercraft development since they were first conceived, over 50 years ago. We offer pioneering new solutions, expert advice, training and consultancy. Our purpose is to enable our customers to engage in tasks in some of the most diverse and inaccessible areas of the world, over 180 Griffon Hoverwork craft operate in 41 countries, allowing us to provide a proven and reliable solution. Despite our customers'​ diverse requirements, they all have one thing in common - a need to access areas where conventional marine craft cannot go. Our success is based upon our commitment to design and manufacture hovercraft which are adapted to the challenging environments that face our customers. We have developed a range of craft that support light, medium and heavy payload needs. All can be customised to meet different mission and environmental conditions. In the commercial role, our hovercraft are used around the globe for: survey work and civil engineering support logistics and cargo carrying passenger ferries coastal, ice and airport crash rescue mobile medical clinics Our hovercraft are also in use by those responsible for national security and military operations, missions include: border patrol and surveillance policing and customs duties marine interdiction and infra structure security weapons platforms, troop carriers and logistics vehicles

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/serck-global.jpeg
Serck Global
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griffon-hoverwork-limited.jpeg
Griffon Hoverwork Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Serck Global
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Griffon Hoverwork Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Serck Global in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Griffon Hoverwork Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Serck Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Serck Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Griffon Hoverwork Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Griffon Hoverwork Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/serck-global.jpeg
Serck Global
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griffon-hoverwork-limited.jpeg
Griffon Hoverwork Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Serck Global company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Serck Global company.

In the current year, Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company and Serck Global company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company nor Serck Global company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company nor Serck Global company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company nor Serck Global company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Serck Global company nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Serck Global company nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Serck Global company employs more people globally than Griffon Hoverwork Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Serck Global nor Griffon Hoverwork Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H