Comparison Overview

Laine IP Oy

VS

Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon

Laine IP Oy

Porkkalankatu 24, Helsinki, 00180, FI
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Laine IP Oy (LAINE Intellectual Property) is a patent and trade mark agency established in Helsinki in 1979. We specialise in obtaining global IP rights for the Finnish exports industry. Our attorneys have experience in most technology fields and are qualified to practice directly in front of the Finnish, European and United States Patent Offices.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon

No Charge for Domestic Travel, Coast to Coast, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24

The outcome of your restaurant-related case could depend on the expert witness you choose. Why not go with the best? Howard Cannon is the nation's premiere Restaurant Forensic Expert Witness with over 300 plus litigation matters and over 350 pre-litigation matters in state and federal courts to his credit. We have offered our expertise and services to both plaintiffs and defendants nationwide for restaurant and bar related cases since 1987. We do not charge for domestic travel. Our fields of expertise include slips, trips, and falls, alcohol liability, restaurant security, customer injury, employee injury, and premises liability. Our founder, Howard Cannon, is the author of several books, including Restaurant OSHA Safety and Security: The Book of Restaurant Industry Standards & Best Practices (2016), The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Starting Your Own Restaurant© (2001), and The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Starting a Restaurant©—second edition (2005). For a free, no-obligation consultation, call 800.300.5764, or visit RestaurantExpertWitness.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seppo-laine-oy.jpeg
Laine IP Oy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restaurant-expert-witness.jpeg
Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Laine IP Oy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laine IP Oy in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon in 2025.

Incident History — Laine IP Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laine IP Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seppo-laine-oy.jpeg
Laine IP Oy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restaurant-expert-witness.jpeg
Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laine IP Oy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Laine IP Oy company.

In the current year, Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company and Laine IP Oy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company nor Laine IP Oy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company nor Laine IP Oy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company nor Laine IP Oy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Laine IP Oy company nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Laine IP Oy company.

Laine IP Oy company employs more people globally than Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Laine IP Oy nor Restaurant Expert Witness - Howard Cannon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X