Comparison Overview

Senior Experts

VS

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Senior Experts

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

„Senior Experts“ ist ein Thinktank, den es seit März 2016 gibt und in dem wir uns in einem Punkt alle einig sind: spätestens im Jahr 2050 wird das durchschnittliche Rentenalter deutlich über 68 liegen. Es braucht heute Initiativen und „Lighthouse Projects“ um Wege aufzuzeigen, wie diese Generation in 10 bis 15 Jahren weiterhin im Berufsleben engagiert werden kann. Der Thinktank entwickelt selber Ideen oder greift Konzepte auf und lanciert sie im kleinen Rahmen: indem Startups oder Stiftungen gegründet werden. Erfolgreiche Projekte werden nach der Testphase medial begleitet, um eine öffentliche Wahrnehmung zu erreichen. Modelle, die sich bewährt haben, werden selbstverständlich weiter entwickelt. Wir wissen, dass bereits sehr viel über dieses Thema diskutiert wird und dass es heute bereits sehr viele Ansätze gibt: die meisten Konzepte werden aber vor allem von grossen Unternehmen (ABB, Swisscom, etc.) isoliert lanciert. Wir suchen Modelle, die breiter gehen und die sich schnell umsetzen lassen.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget is a bipartisan, non-profit organization committed to educating the public about issues that have significant fiscal policy impact. The Committee is made up of some of the nation's leading budget experts including many of the past Chairmen and Directors of the Budget Committees, the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget, the Government Accountability Office, and the Federal Reserve Board. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/BudgetHawks Follow us on Twitter (@BudgetHawks) https://twitter.com/#!/BudgetHawks

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior-experts.jpeg
Senior Experts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Senior Experts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senior Experts in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget in 2025.

Incident History — Senior Experts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senior Experts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior-experts.jpeg
Senior Experts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Senior Experts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Senior Experts company.

In the current year, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company and Senior Experts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Senior Experts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Senior Experts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor Senior Experts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Senior Experts company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Senior Experts company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company employs more people globally than Senior Experts company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Senior Experts nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X