Comparison Overview

Senator John Heinz History Center

VS

Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum

Senator John Heinz History Center

1212 Smallman St, Pittsburgh, 15222, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Devoted to the history and heritage of Western Pennsylvania, the Senator John Heinz History Center is Pennsylvania’s largest history museum and a proud affiliate of the Smithsonian Institution. The six-floor, 275,000-square-foot museum and research facility, located in Pittsburgh's Strip District, presents the most compelling stories from American history with a Western Pennsylvania connection, all in an interactive environment perfect for visitors of every age. A variety of long-term and changing exhibits reveal the fascinating scope and impact of American history with a regional connection. The Western Pennsylvania Sports Museum, a museum-within-a-museum located on the History Center 's second and third floors, celebrates Western Pennsylvania’s unsurpassed sports legacy. More than 250 years of our region’s history can also be explored in our Detre Library & Archives. MISSION STATEMENT The History Center is an educational institution that engages and inspires a large and diverse audience with links to the past, understanding in the present, and guidance for the future by preserving regional history and presenting the American experience with a Western Pennsylvania connection. This work is accomplished in partnership with others through archaeology, archives, artifact collections, conservation, educational programs, exhibitions, library, museums, performance, publications, research, technical assistance, and increasingly through broadcast media and the internet.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum

7400 Bay Rd., University Center, MI, 48710, US
Last Update: 2026-01-12

The mission of the Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum is to celebrate the artistic legacy of Marshall M. Fredericks through collecting, preserving, presenting, and interpreting his life’s work for the educational and cultural enrichment of Saginaw Valley State University and the broadest possible audience. Through the Marshall Fredericks objects collection and archives, temporary exhibitions, publications, and education programs, the Museum contributes to scholarly discourse and serves diverse audiences. To accomplish this mission, the Museum pursues the following strategic objectives: * Promote awareness, appreciation, preservation, and understanding of the life and works of Marshall M. Fredericks. * Embed an educational component in everything we do. * Maintain the collection and present exhibitions of Marshall Fredericks and other artists in accordance with the highest museum standards. * Foster the mission of the museum and Saginaw Valley State University through education, research, exhibitions, publications, and outreach efforts. * Increase community awareness of and attendance at the Museum. * Operate in a fiscally responsible and sustainable manner. * Maintain accreditation by the American Alliance of Museums.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senator-john-heinz-history-center.jpeg
Senator John Heinz History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mfsm.jpeg
Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Senator John Heinz History Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senator John Heinz History Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Senator John Heinz History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senator John Heinz History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senator-john-heinz-history-center.jpeg
Senator John Heinz History Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mfsm.jpeg
Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Senator John Heinz History Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Senator John Heinz History Center company.

In the current year, Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company and Senator John Heinz History Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company nor Senator John Heinz History Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company nor Senator John Heinz History Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company nor Senator John Heinz History Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center company nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center company nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Senator John Heinz History Center company employs more people globally than Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Senator John Heinz History Center nor Marshall M. Fredericks Sculpture Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N