Comparison Overview

Senator Company

VS

Buying Legal Council

Senator Company

Legal address, Moscow, 109004, RU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

"Senator Company" is the leading Russian company, providing professional services in a sphere of migration and visa support. Since the 2002 year “Senator Company” provides services and solutions regarding migration legislation compliance: • Full range of services and solutions on the process of entry documents obtaining: o Consulting services and support for foreign citizens in the matters of Russian migration legislation (letter of invitation obtaining procedure). o Assistance in documents preparing and visa documents accounting for Russian and international staff. o Assistance in accreditation of legal entities and representative offices at authorized state bodies. • Legal consulting and solutions regarding migration legislation matters: o Conducting training seminars and workshops on migration issues. o Comprehensive audit of company internal processes on compliance with labor migration legislation. o Strategic solutions aimed at compliance of the laws regulating the stay of foreign citizens in the Russian Federation. • Full range of services and assistance in processing travel documents (outbound visas) for Russian and foreign citizens going abroad. The proof of our service quality is the confidence of our clients. Companies of different industries turn to us for advice and assistance in abiding migration legislation, developing programs of staff relocations management.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Buying Legal Council

New York, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Our mission is to advance the field of legal services and legal technology, enhance the value and performance of legal procurement practitioners and their organizations, foster dialogue between buyers and sellers, and document and promote best practices. We identify and provide solutions to both strategic and operational challenges our members face and prepare them for tomorrow’s opportunities and challenges. The Buying Legal Council facilitates an innovative dialogue between buyers and sellers of legal services, as well as other stakeholders in the legal market.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senator-company.jpeg
Senator Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Senator Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Buying Legal Council
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senator Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buying Legal Council in 2025.

Incident History — Senator Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senator Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Buying Legal Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buying Legal Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senator-company.jpeg
Senator Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buying-legal-council.jpeg
Buying Legal Council
Incidents

FAQ

Senator Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buying Legal Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Buying Legal Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Senator Company company.

In the current year, Buying Legal Council company and Senator Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor Senator Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor Senator Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor Senator Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Senator Company company nor Buying Legal Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Senator Company company nor Buying Legal Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Senator Company company employs more people globally than Buying Legal Council company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Senator Company nor Buying Legal Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X