Comparison Overview

Sempra

VS

Grupo Energisa

Sempra

488 8th Ave, San Diego, CA, 92101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Sempra is a leading North American energy infrastructure company focused on delivering energy to nearly 40 million consumers. As owner of one of the largest energy networks on the continent, Sempra is electrifying and improving the energy resilience of some of the world's most significant economic markets, including California, Texas, Mexico and global energy market. The company is recognized as a leader in sustainable business practices and for its high-performance culture focused on safety and operational excellence, as demonstrated by Sempra's inclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index North America and in The Wall Street Journal's Best Managed Companies. More information about Sempra is available at sempra.com and on social media @Sempra.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 2,593
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grupo Energisa

Cataguases, Minas Gerais, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-25

O Grupo Energisa tem na distribuição de energia elétrica a principal base de seu negócio. Com cinco distribuidoras no Brasil, das quais três na região Nordeste (Energisa Sergipe - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de Energipe, no Estado de Sergipe, Energisa Paraíba - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de Saelpa e Energisa Borborema - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de CELB na Paraíba), uma na Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais (Energisa Minas Gerais - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de CFLCL) e uma em Nova Friburgo, no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Energisa Nova Friburgo - Distribuidora de Energia S/A nova denominação de CENF), abrange 91.180 Km² de área coberta. Ao todo, são aproximadamente 2,4 milhões de consumidores e uma população atendida de 6,7 milhões de habitantes em 352 municípios. Atualmente, mais de 5,0 mil colaboradores diretos e indiretos fazem parte das suas empresas.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sempra-energy.jpeg
Sempra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energisa.jpeg
Grupo Energisa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sempra
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grupo Energisa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sempra in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Energisa in 2025.

Incident History — Sempra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sempra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grupo Energisa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Energisa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sempra-energy.jpeg
Sempra
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energisa.jpeg
Grupo Energisa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sempra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grupo Energisa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grupo Energisa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sempra company.

In the current year, Grupo Energisa company and Sempra company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grupo Energisa company nor Sempra company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grupo Energisa company nor Sempra company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grupo Energisa company nor Sempra company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sempra company nor Grupo Energisa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sempra company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Grupo Energisa company.

Grupo Energisa company employs more people globally than Sempra company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sempra nor Grupo Energisa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H