Comparison Overview

Semicron Systems

VS

SANBlaze

Semicron Systems

201 S. McDonald Street, Suite C, McKinney, Texas, US, 75069
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Semicron Systems is a worldwide dealer and supplier of Point of Sale Systems hardware and software, including computers, Cash Register Express and Restaurant pro Express software, remote environmental conditions monitoring and control devices, and age verification devices. Since its establishment in 1999, Semicron has helped thousands of individuals, businesses and organizations achieve their retail and restaurant Point of Sale inventory tracking and control, Identification verification, and remote environmental monitoring needs. We are committed to delivering reliable and cost-effective solutions that save our customers money.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SANBlaze

One Monarch Drive, Suite204, Littleton, MA, 01460, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SANBlaze Technology, Inc. is a pioneer in storage emulation technologies and a leading provider of storage, networking and multifunction solutions for embedded systems. SANBlaze emulation systems are deployed in the test and development labs of most major storage hardware and software vendors worldwide. SANBlaze embedded computing products include a complete line of ATCA® and AMC board level solutions, as well as preconfigured and integrated systems solutions. These products are deployed into telecom and defense applications

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/semicron-systems.jpeg
Semicron Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanblaze-technology-inc-.jpeg
SANBlaze
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Semicron Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SANBlaze
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Semicron Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SANBlaze in 2025.

Incident History — Semicron Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Semicron Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SANBlaze (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SANBlaze cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/semicron-systems.jpeg
Semicron Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanblaze-technology-inc-.jpeg
SANBlaze
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SANBlaze company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Semicron Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SANBlaze company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Semicron Systems company.

In the current year, SANBlaze company and Semicron Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SANBlaze company nor Semicron Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SANBlaze company nor Semicron Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SANBlaze company nor Semicron Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Semicron Systems company nor SANBlaze company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Semicron Systems company nor SANBlaze company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SANBlaze company employs more people globally than Semicron Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Semicron Systems nor SANBlaze holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H