Comparison Overview

Sells Printing Company LLC

VS

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company

Sells Printing Company LLC

16000 West Rogers Drive, New Berlin, 53151, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Ripon Printers of Ripon, Wisconsin, purchased certain business interests of the Sells Printing Company on March 27, 2012. As a valued Sells Printing customer you will be happy to hear Ripon Printers shares our passion for exceeding the customers’ expectations, including yours. Your contacts within the company will remain; specifically your sales executive and your customer service representative will continue to service your account. For more information about Ripon’s capabilities, equipment, company, and their passion for customer delight visit their website www.riponprinters.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company

9900 Pflumm rd suite 29, Lenexa, KS, 66215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Brightmarks, LLC is a print enhancement company focused on providing our customer a return on print investment that is unmatched by typical commercial printers. Most commercial printer assets are in place to put ink on paper. They then broker the finishing work, often resulting in multiple vendors and multiple markups. At Brightmarks, LLC. our machinery is in place to finish the print job while brokering the print. Although there are hundreds of printers to choose from, we have meticulously selected a handful who have demonstrated their market leading ability to put ink on paper correctly and on time! Since so much of the cost of a print job is in the finishing, we substantially lower the cost of the job by eliminating multiple companies handling your project. We also significantly raise the quality of the finished piece because it is not handled by multiple vendors. The printed press sheets are finished, in house, under one roof by one company! follow us on Twitter - @brightmarks

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sells-printing-company-llc.jpeg
Sells Printing Company LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightmarks-llc..jpeg
BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sells Printing Company LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sells Printing Company LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company in 2025.

Incident History — Sells Printing Company LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sells Printing Company LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sells-printing-company-llc.jpeg
Sells Printing Company LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightmarks-llc..jpeg
BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sells Printing Company LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sells Printing Company LLC company.

In the current year, BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company and Sells Printing Company LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company nor Sells Printing Company LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company nor Sells Printing Company LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company nor Sells Printing Company LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC company nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC company nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sells Printing Company LLC company employs more people globally than BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sells Printing Company LLC nor BrightMARKS - A Print & Packaging Enhancement Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L