Comparison Overview

Graeme Jenkinson Ltd

VS

Glamour

Graeme Jenkinson Ltd

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

A freelance digital designer based in Surrey available for contract work. I specialise in responsive html email design and code. Please check out my other site - www.responsiveemail.co.uk.

NAICS: 512
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,880
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Glamour

285 Fulton St New York, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Glamour is a women's magazine published by Condโˆšยฉ Nast Publications. Founded in 1939 in the United States, it was originally called Glamour of Hollywood. Glamour covers the stories women wantโ€šร„รฎand needโ€šร„รฎto read right now, with high-quality journalism and an authentic, accessible point of view. Here, youโ€šร„รดll find up-to-the-instant coverage of the issues affecting womenโ€šร„รดs livesโ€šร„รฎfrom politics to #MeToo; fashion that is attainable; beautyโ€šร„รฎboth inside and outโ€šร„รฎand a holistic approach to wellness; sex and relationships; as well as the TV, movies, books, and pop culture youโ€šร„รดre obsessed with. Local editions are now published in numerous countries including the United Kingdom, United States, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Russia, Greece, Poland, South Africa, Brazil, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Netherlands, Mexico. In most cases it is a monthly publication.

NAICS: 512
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/self-imployed.jpeg
Graeme Jenkinson Ltd
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glamour.jpeg
Glamour
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Graeme Jenkinson Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glamour
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graeme Jenkinson Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glamour in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Graeme Jenkinson Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graeme Jenkinson Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Glamour (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glamour cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/self-imployed.jpeg
Graeme Jenkinson Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glamour.jpeg
Glamour
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company and Glamour company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Glamour company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company.

In the current year, Glamour company and Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glamour company nor Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glamour company nor Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glamour company nor Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company nor Glamour company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company nor Glamour company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graeme Jenkinson Ltd company employs more people globally than Glamour company, reflecting its scale as a Media Production.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H