Comparison Overview

Select Counsel

VS

Fraser Litigation Group

Select Counsel

One Market Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Select Counsel (www.selectcounsel.law) is the leading platform for accessing premier boutique law firms around the globe. There are close to 350 lawyers in the Select Counsel network, spanning 25 countries, with expertise across nearly every type of legal specialty. Leveraging our network, clients can quickly find the same caliber attorneys, breadth of expertise and geographic reach of a big firm with the price point and personalized service of a smaller practice that offers direct access to senior attorneys. For specialized matters, international needs or projects that just don't justify big firm rates, Select Counsel is your resource for finding reliable and cost-effective outside counsel. At the same time, Select Counsel is a virtual community where the nation’s top, boutique firm attorneys can network, collaborate and serve as a resource to one another, all in effort to better serve clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fraser Litigation Group

570 Granville Street, Vancouver, V6C 3P1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Fraser Litigation Group is a Vancouver based commercial litigation and dispute resolution firm. We have a deep understanding of issues affecting businesses and offer innovative and cost-effective strategies for practically resolving a wide variety of complex commercial disputes, including breaches of contract, shareholder and partner disputes, insurance coverage, fraud, and intellectual property issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/select-counsel.jpeg
Select Counsel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraser-litigation-group.jpeg
Fraser Litigation Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Select Counsel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fraser Litigation Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Select Counsel in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fraser Litigation Group in 2025.

Incident History — Select Counsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Select Counsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fraser Litigation Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fraser Litigation Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/select-counsel.jpeg
Select Counsel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fraser-litigation-group.jpeg
Fraser Litigation Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fraser Litigation Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Select Counsel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fraser Litigation Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Select Counsel company.

In the current year, Fraser Litigation Group company and Select Counsel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fraser Litigation Group company nor Select Counsel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fraser Litigation Group company nor Select Counsel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fraser Litigation Group company nor Select Counsel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Select Counsel company nor Fraser Litigation Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Select Counsel company nor Fraser Litigation Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fraser Litigation Group company employs more people globally than Select Counsel company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Select Counsel nor Fraser Litigation Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X