Comparison Overview

Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers

VS

TechniPrint

Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers

21221 S. Western Avenue, Suite 250, Torrance, CA, US, 90501
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sii-thermalprinters.com/direct-thermal-printers.aspx

SII Thermal Printer Division is a pioneer in high-performance, high-reliability direct thermal printing solutions. SII has shipped over 50 million units worldwide and is a global market leader in direct thermal print mechanisms. Direct thermal printers produce images by applying a heating element to specially treated paper. Unlike thermal transfer, dot matrix, and other technologies, no ribbons or toner are required, reducing operating costs. With very few moving parts, direct thermal provides exceptionally high reliability printing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TechniPrint

undefined, undefined, undefined, 55317, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.techniprint.net

TechniPrint offers a wide range of industrial printing solutions to manufacturers of medical devices and electronic components. Our focus is on close tolerance screen and pad printing services as well as permanent labels, nameplates, control panel fronts, etc. Medical device printing and printing on silicone as well as electronic devices are some of our core specialties. Our services include: • Screen printing • Pad printing • Etching, Laser and Die Cutting • Design • Engineering We can help you design your product and determine the best printing method for your application. Whether you need simple nameplate printing or something more complicated like printing on a curved plastic or metal panel, we can help.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seiko-instruments-usa.jpeg
Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techniprint.jpeg
TechniPrint
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TechniPrint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TechniPrint in 2025.

Incident History — Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TechniPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TechniPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seiko-instruments-usa.jpeg
Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/techniprint.jpeg
TechniPrint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TechniPrint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TechniPrint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company.

In the current year, TechniPrint company and Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TechniPrint company nor Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TechniPrint company nor Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TechniPrint company nor Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company nor TechniPrint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company nor TechniPrint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TechniPrint company employs more people globally than Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA Thermal Printers nor TechniPrint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References