Comparison Overview

Seiko Instruments USA, Inc.

VS

VYCON, Inc.

Seiko Instruments USA, Inc.

21221 S. Western Avenue, Torrance, CA, 90501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seikoinstruments.com

Seiko Instruments Inc. (represented in the U.S. by Seiko Instruments USA Inc.) is a manufacturing organization historically responsible for the design and production of timepieces that established the SEIKO brand name. They currently manufacture and market a wide variety of other products such as electronic components, scientific instruments, information systems, communication products, machine tools and printers that are an outgrowth of watch making technology.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

VYCON, Inc.

14592 Central Ave., Chino, CA, 91710, US
Last Update: 2025-11-15
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vyconenergy.com

VYCON is a manufacturer of technologically advanced flywheel energy storage systems that enable a highly reliable, cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution for a variety of data center and other power-dependent applications. VYCON’s products are used in power quality markets to provide instantaneous backup power in mission-critical applications and in the energy re-cycling markets for capturing and regenerating energy in electric rail, industrial and distributed generation applications. As a result, VYCON is uniquely well positioned to immediately fulfill its vision of delivering smarter energy solutions for today’s critical infrastructures.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seiko-instruments-usa-inc-.jpeg
Seiko Instruments USA, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vycon.jpeg
VYCON, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seiko Instruments USA, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VYCON, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VYCON, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VYCON, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VYCON, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seiko-instruments-usa-inc-.jpeg
Seiko Instruments USA, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vycon.jpeg
VYCON, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company and VYCON, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, VYCON, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company.

In the current year, VYCON, Inc. company and Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VYCON, Inc. company nor Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VYCON, Inc. company nor Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VYCON, Inc. company nor Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company nor VYCON, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company nor VYCON, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. company employs more people globally than VYCON, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seiko Instruments USA, Inc. nor VYCON, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References