Comparison Overview

SEEDS Engineering, Inc.

VS

B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.)

SEEDS Engineering, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SEEDS Engineering, Inc. is a consulting engineering firm specializing in mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection design services through in-house engineering and strategic partner alliances. Our collective engineering experience covers a broad range of projects for many different clients in the private and public sectors. Our LEED accredited professional engineers are dedicated to providing comprehensive engineering services for both new and existing buildings, including renovation, expansion, rehabilitation and modernization.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.)

1226 Progressive Dr, Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

FeO has more than 20 years of experience in corrosion control. As world leader in the field of coatings inspection, you can rely on our expertise and certifications. Contact us to get started. We are an SSPC QP5-certified, coating inspection and corrosion control consulting company, with operations both in the US and Overseas. Go to https://bninspects.com or call 1-844-4FEOINC (433-6462) for more information.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SEEDS Engineering, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/feo-incorporated.jpeg
B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SEEDS Engineering, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEEDS Engineering, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) in 2025.

Incident History — SEEDS Engineering, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEEDS Engineering, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SEEDS Engineering, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/feo-incorporated.jpeg
B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company.

In the current year, B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company and SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company nor SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company nor SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company nor SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company.

B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) company employs more people globally than SEEDS Engineering, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SEEDS Engineering, Inc. nor B&N Inspection (Formerly: FeO Inc.) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H