Comparison Overview

SEE Science Center

VS

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

SEE Science Center

200 Bedford St., None, Manchester, NH, US, 03101
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.see-sciencecenter.org

Founded by renowned inventor and entrepreneur Dean Kamen, the SEE Science Center was dedicated in April of 1986 and has been engaging visitors of all ages in the pursuit of science discovery ever since. Located in Manchester, NH SEE is a member of the Association of Science and Technology Centers and their passport program. The SEE Science Center is open Tuesday through Friday 10am to 4pm, and Saturday & Sunday 10am to 5pm. SEE offers a variety of experiences: -Hands-on exhibits covering topics such as: forces, light, sound electricity, simple machines and more. -Daily Demonstrations -The LEGO® Millyard Project on permanent display. -Science Gift Shop -Group programs including field trip tours, labs and LEGO® programs. -Outreach programs for schools, libraries and community groups -Programs for adults, kids and families -Summer Camps -Birthday Parties -Annual Family Membership program By applying creativity, determination and attention to science curricula, SEE has been able to achieve consumer satisfaction among children, parents and teachers. SEE has become the place in New Hampshire to experience hands-on science fun. SEE is an IRS designated 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

Port Arthur Historic Site, Arthur Highway, Port Arthur, Tasmania, AU, 7182
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.portarthur.org.au

Port Arthur Historic Site is a special place of vivid history, cultural heritage and stories so compelling, you’ll want to hear them again and again. It’s a place of global significance – one of the 11 places that make up the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Australian Convict Sites. And it’s one of Australia’s favourite tourist destinations. Cascades Female Factory Historic Site aims to foster a greater understanding and appreciation for the largely untold story of female convicts sent to Australia. Cascades Female Factory Historic Site is the most significant site associated with female convicts in Australia, it is listed as one of the 11 sites that together form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 2010. The Coal Mines Historic Site is an outstanding example of the 19th-century European global strategy of using the forced labour of convicts. Illustrating the importance of labour and production, classification, punishment and surveillance in the penal system and the role of the convict in the establishment of colonial economies, the Coal Mines Historic Site is listed as one of the 11 sites that together form the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage Property, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 2010.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/see-science-center.jpeg
SEE Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-arthur-historic-site-management-authority.jpeg
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SEE Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEE Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority in 2026.

Incident History — SEE Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEE Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/see-science-center.jpeg
SEE Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/port-arthur-historic-site-management-authority.jpeg
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SEE Science Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SEE Science Center company.

In the current year, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company and SEE Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor SEE Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor SEE Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company nor SEE Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SEE Science Center company nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SEE Science Center company.

Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority company employs more people globally than SEE Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SEE Science Center nor Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References