Comparison Overview

Security Bank Corporation

VS

UniCredit

Security Bank Corporation

6776 Ayala Avenue, Makati, NCR, 1200, PH
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.securitybank.com

Security Bank is one of the Philippines’ best-capitalized private domestic universal banks. Established in 1951 and publicly listed with the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE: SECB) in 1995, our major businesses cover retail, corporate, commercial, and business (MSME) banking. We’re recognized as an Employer of Choice in Philippine banking by various award-giving bodies for our values-based culture, industry-leading engagement and benefits, and commitment to work-life balance. Most recently, we ranked #2 best employer in the Philippines and #54 globally on the prestigious Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2023 list. At Security Bank, our approach to Human Capital Management (HCM) is embodied by our Employee Value Proposition (EVP): “YOU matter.” Start your BetterBankingcareer with us today. For the complete list of Security Bank's awards, you may visit: https://www.securitybank.com/about-us/awards/

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,494
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UniCredit

Piazza Gae Aulenti, 3, Milano, 20154, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unicreditgroup.eu

UniCredit is a pan-European Bank with a unique service offering in Italy, Germany, Austria, and Central and Eastern Europe. Our Vision is to be the Bank for Europe's Future. Our Purpose is to Empower Communities to Progress, delivering the best-in-class products and services for all stakeholders, unlocking the potential of our people and our clients across Europe. Our core operations are located in Italy, Germany, Austria and Central and Eastern European Countries, all served by three Group high-quality product factories: Corporate, Individual and Payment Solutions.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 55,599
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/security-bank-corporation.jpeg
Security Bank Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicredit.jpeg
UniCredit
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Security Bank Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UniCredit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Security Bank Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UniCredit in 2025.

Incident History — Security Bank Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Security Bank Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UniCredit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UniCredit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/security-bank-corporation.jpeg
Security Bank Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicredit.jpeg
UniCredit
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2020
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UniCredit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Security Bank Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UniCredit company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Security Bank Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, UniCredit company and Security Bank Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UniCredit company nor Security Bank Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UniCredit company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Security Bank Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UniCredit company nor Security Bank Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Security Bank Corporation company nor UniCredit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UniCredit company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Security Bank Corporation company.

UniCredit company employs more people globally than Security Bank Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor UniCredit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References