Comparison Overview

Security Bank Corporation

VS

Bank Alfalah Limited

Security Bank Corporation

6776 Ayala Avenue, Makati, NCR, 1200, PH
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.securitybank.com

Security Bank is one of the Philippines’ best-capitalized private domestic universal banks. Established in 1951 and publicly listed with the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE: SECB) in 1995, our major businesses cover retail, corporate, commercial, and business (MSME) banking. We’re recognized as an Employer of Choice in Philippine banking by various award-giving bodies for our values-based culture, industry-leading engagement and benefits, and commitment to work-life balance. Most recently, we ranked #2 best employer in the Philippines and #54 globally on the prestigious Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2023 list. At Security Bank, our approach to Human Capital Management (HCM) is embodied by our Employee Value Proposition (EVP): “YOU matter.” Start your BetterBankingcareer with us today. For the complete list of Security Bank's awards, you may visit: https://www.securitybank.com/about-us/awards/

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,494
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bank Alfalah Limited

B.A. Building, I I Chundrigar Road, Karachi, Sindh, undefined, PK
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bankalfalah.com

Bank Alfalah is one of the largest private Banks in Pakistan with a network of over 1100 branches in more than 200 cities across Pakistan with an international presence in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bahrain, and a representative office in the UAE. The Bank is owned and operated by the Abu Dhabi Group. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank partnered with the Bank in 2014 and holds a 15 percent stake in Bank Alfalah. Incorporated as a public limited company on 21st June 1992, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, Bank Alfalah commenced banking operations from 1st November 1997. The Bank provides financial solutions to consumers, corporations, institutions, and governments through a broad spectrum of products and services, including corporate and investment banking, consumer banking and credit, securities brokerage, commercial, SME, agri-finance, Islamic and asset financing. JCR-VIS has assigned an entity rating of ‘AA+’ (double-A plus) for the long-term and ‘A1+’ (One plus) for the short-term, with a stable outlook. PACRA has assigned Bank Alfalah ‘AA+’ (double-A plus) entity rating for the long-term and ‘A1+’ (One plus) for the short-term, with a positive outlook. The Bank is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,583
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/security-bank-corporation.jpeg
Security Bank Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-alfalah-limited.jpeg
Bank Alfalah Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Security Bank Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank Alfalah Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Security Bank Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank Alfalah Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Security Bank Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Security Bank Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank Alfalah Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank Alfalah Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/security-bank-corporation.jpeg
Security Bank Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-alfalah-limited.jpeg
Bank Alfalah Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Security Bank Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank Alfalah Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bank Alfalah Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Security Bank Corporation company.

In the current year, Bank Alfalah Limited company and Security Bank Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor Security Bank Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor Security Bank Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor Security Bank Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Security Bank Corporation company nor Bank Alfalah Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Security Bank Corporation company nor Bank Alfalah Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bank Alfalah Limited company employs more people globally than Security Bank Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Security Bank Corporation nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References