Comparison Overview

SECURENET-TECH

VS

Swisscom

SECURENET-TECH

London, London, London, GB, SE1
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.securenet-tech.net/

Provide on-demand IT engineering, technical services, professional services, consultancy, IT support, managed services and cloud solutions. Service sand solutions to help our clients fill IT skills and knowledge gaps, manage existing IT infrastructure, help plan/design/implement and support new on-premise (hardware/software) solutions for migrations to cloud/manaed services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Swisscom

Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.swisscom.ch/

As No. 1, we inspire people in the connected world. With the latest technologies and innovations, together we have the opportunity to shape the future. To do this, we are and act trustworthy, committed and curious. Are you with us? Join us on this exciting journey and work with us or in one of the DevOps Centres in Riga or Rotterdam in different business areas on the latest technological trends. Find out more about us and our vacancies on our careers page: www.swisscom.ch/career We look forward to hearing from you!

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 15,427
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swisscom.jpeg
Swisscom
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SECURENET-TECH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swisscom
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SECURENET-TECH in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swisscom in 2025.

Incident History — SECURENET-TECH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SECURENET-TECH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swisscom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swisscom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown vulnerability in software
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swisscom.jpeg
Swisscom
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Swisscom company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SECURENET-TECH and Swisscom have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Swisscom company and SECURENET-TECH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

SECURENET-TECH company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Swisscom company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Swisscom company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SECURENET-TECH company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Swisscom company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH company nor Swisscom company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Swisscom company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SECURENET-TECH company.

Swisscom company employs more people globally than SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor Swisscom holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References