Comparison Overview

SECURENET-TECH

VS

ITC Infotech

SECURENET-TECH

London, London, London, GB, SE1
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.securenet-tech.net/

Provide on-demand IT engineering, technical services, professional services, consultancy, IT support, managed services and cloud solutions. Service sand solutions to help our clients fill IT skills and knowledge gaps, manage existing IT infrastructure, help plan/design/implement and support new on-premise (hardware/software) solutions for migrations to cloud/manaed services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

ITC Infotech

No.18, Banaswadi Main Road, Maruthiseva Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560005
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.itcinfotech.com

ITC Infotech is a global technology solution and services leader providing business-friendly solutions, that enable future-readiness for clients. We seamlessly bring together digital expertise, strong industry-specific alliances, and deep domain expertise from ITC Group businesses. Our solutions and services are focused on Banking and financial Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Consumer Goods, Travel and Hospitality. ITC Infotech is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITC Ltd, one of India’s most admired companies.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 18,759
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-infotech.jpeg
ITC Infotech
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SECURENET-TECH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ITC Infotech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SECURENET-TECH in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Infotech in 2025.

Incident History — SECURENET-TECH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SECURENET-TECH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ITC Infotech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Infotech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown vulnerability in software
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-infotech.jpeg
ITC Infotech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ITC Infotech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SECURENET-TECH company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ITC Infotech company has not reported any.

In the current year, ITC Infotech company and SECURENET-TECH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

SECURENET-TECH company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ITC Infotech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ITC Infotech company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ITC Infotech company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH company nor ITC Infotech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ITC Infotech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SECURENET-TECH company.

ITC Infotech company employs more people globally than SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor ITC Infotech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References