Comparison Overview

SECURENET-TECH

VS

HCLTech

SECURENET-TECH

London, London, London, GB, SE1
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.securenet-tech.net/

Provide on-demand IT engineering, technical services, professional services, consultancy, IT support, managed services and cloud solutions. Service sand solutions to help our clients fill IT skills and knowledge gaps, manage existing IT infrastructure, help plan/design/implement and support new on-premise (hardware/software) solutions for migrations to cloud/manaed services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

HCLTech

undefined, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.hcltech.com

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 220,000 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around digital, engineering, cloud and AI, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work with clients across all major verticals, providing industry solutions for Financial Services, Manufacturing, Life Sciences and Healthcare, Technology and Services, Telecom and Media, Retail and CPG, and Public Services. Consolidated revenues as of 12 months ending December 2024 totaled $13.8 billion. To learn how we can supercharge progress for you, visit hcltech.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 246,894
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcl-technologies.jpeg
HCLTech
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SECURENET-TECH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HCLTech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SECURENET-TECH in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCLTech in 2025.

Incident History — SECURENET-TECH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SECURENET-TECH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HCLTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown vulnerability in software
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcl-technologies.jpeg
HCLTech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HCLTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SECURENET-TECH company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HCLTech company has not reported any.

In the current year, HCLTech company and SECURENET-TECH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

SECURENET-TECH company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while HCLTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HCLTech company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HCLTech company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH company nor HCLTech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HCLTech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SECURENET-TECH company.

HCLTech company employs more people globally than SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor HCLTech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References