Comparison Overview

Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC

VS

Institute of Couples Therapy

Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC

20 East Tab Street, Petersburg, VA., 23803, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Second Chances Comprehensive Services serves adults and children demonstrating a clinical necessity arising from conditions due to mental, substance abuse, behavioral, or emotional illnesses that result in significant functional impairments in major life activities. SCCS seeks to assist families in achieving a stable, healthy home environment by reducing or eliminating problematic behaviors; SCCS seeks to successfully prevent out of home placements; Offers a variety of services and interventions to meet the individualized needs of the families in services; SCCS coordinates and collaborates with others external agencies to ensure maximizing of the families opportunities for success; SCCS empowers families to competently participate in treatment decision-making; and SCCS seeks to teach functional and adaptable skills to individuals in the family unit to help maintain unity. Mission SCCS Mission is based on family Cohesiveness. SCCS believes that children and adolescents are best served through preserving the family system. it is the mission of SCCS to empower our community by preserving the family unit through the use of ground breaking individual and family therapeutic coaching, support, education and guidance.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Institute of Couples Therapy

None, None, Cork, None, IE, None
Last Update: 2026-01-19

The Institute of Couples Therapy offers specialized training for therapists seeking to incorporate couples work into their practice. Our program equips therapists with the skills to assist couples in cultivating intimate and trusting relationships. We empower individuals to navigate their own desires and those of their partners, fostering mutual respect in the process.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/second-chances-comprehensive-services-llc.jpeg
Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-couples-therapy.jpeg
Institute of Couples Therapy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute of Couples Therapy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Couples Therapy in 2026.

Incident History — Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute of Couples Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Couples Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/second-chances-comprehensive-services-llc.jpeg
Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-couples-therapy.jpeg
Institute of Couples Therapy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Institute of Couples Therapy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Institute of Couples Therapy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company.

In the current year, Institute of Couples Therapy company and Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute of Couples Therapy company nor Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute of Couples Therapy company nor Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute of Couples Therapy company nor Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company nor Institute of Couples Therapy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company nor Institute of Couples Therapy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC company employs more people globally than Institute of Couples Therapy company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Second Chances Comprehensive Services, LLC nor Institute of Couples Therapy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N