Comparison Overview

SEB

VS

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

SEB

Kungsträdgårdsgatan 8, Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, 10640
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

SEB is a leading northern European financial services group with a strong belief that entrepreneurial minds and innovative companies are key in creating a better world. SEB takes a long-term perspective and supports its customers in good times and bad. In Sweden and the Baltic countries, SEB offers financial advice and a wide range of financial services. In Denmark, Finland, Norway and Germany the bank's operations have a strong focus on corporate and investment banking based on a full-service offering to corporate and institutional clients. The international nature of SEB's business is reflected in its presence in some 20 countries worldwide. Read more about SEB at www.sebgroup.com Privacy note about SEB’s processing of your personal data can be found at: www.sebgroup.com/legal-and-regulatory-information/privacy-at-seb-group Content shared on this page may contain commercial information from SEB.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,737
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China

No.55 FuXingMenNei Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.C, Beijing, Beijing, 100140, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. (ICBC) (simplified Chinese: 中国工商银行; traditional Chinese: 中國工商銀行; pinyin: Zhōngguó Gōngshāng Yínháng, more commonly just 工行 Gōngháng) is China's largest bank and the largest bank in the world. It is one of China's "Big Four" state-owned commercial banks (the other three being the Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, and China Construction Bank). It is the largest bank in the world in terms of market value, the world's largest bank by deposits, and the world's most profitable bank. It was founded as a limited company on January 1, 1984. As of 2009, it had assets of RMB 11 trillion (US$1.6 trillion), with over 18,000 outlets including 106 overseas branches and agents globally. In July 2007, with a market capitalization of US$254 billion, it became the world's most valuable bank after a surge in its share price, overtaking Citigroup.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 19,772
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seb.jpeg
SEB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icbc_2.jpeg
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SEB
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEB in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in 2025.

Incident History — SEB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seb.jpeg
SEB
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icbc_2.jpeg
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SEB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SEB company.

In the current year, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company and SEB company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company nor SEB company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company nor SEB company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company nor SEB company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SEB company nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SEB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company.

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China company employs more people globally than SEB company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SEB nor Industrial and Commercial Bank of China holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N