Comparison Overview

Seattle Rep

VS

Santa Barbara Symphony

Seattle Rep

155 Mercer St, Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Seattle Rep puts theater at the heart of public life. Founded in 1963 and winner of the 1990 Tony Award for Outstanding Regional Theatre, Seattle Rep is currently led by Artistic Director Dámaso Rodríguez and Managing Director Jeffrey Herrmann. Over a season and throughout the year, Seattle Rep collaborates with extraordinary artists to create productions and programs that reflect and elevate the diverse cultures, perspectives, and life experiences of the Pacific Northwest. Seattle Rep’s nationally recognized programs include the New Play Program, Seattle Rep's Public Works, the Next Narrative Monologue Competition, Pay What You Choose, and numerous audience enrichment and engagement opportunities including post-play panels, discussions, and community events.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 179
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Santa Barbara Symphony

1330 State Street, Suite 102, Santa Barbara, CA, 93101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

The Santa Barbara Symphony was founded in 1953 on the belief that a special city deserves a special orchestra. For over 60 years, the Santa Barbara Symphony has been lauded for its unique ability to deliver brilliant concerts, engage the community at large, and deliver powerful music education programs. The Symphony is integral to the cultural fabric of greater Santa Barbara – today, more than 35,000 people attend Symphony concerts and programs each year.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattlerep.jpeg
Seattle Rep
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-barbara-symphony.jpeg
Santa Barbara Symphony
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seattle Rep
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santa Barbara Symphony
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle Rep in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Barbara Symphony in 2025.

Incident History — Seattle Rep (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle Rep cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santa Barbara Symphony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Barbara Symphony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattlerep.jpeg
Seattle Rep
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-barbara-symphony.jpeg
Santa Barbara Symphony
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Seattle Rep company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Santa Barbara Symphony company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Santa Barbara Symphony company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seattle Rep company.

In the current year, Santa Barbara Symphony company and Seattle Rep company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santa Barbara Symphony company nor Seattle Rep company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Santa Barbara Symphony company nor Seattle Rep company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Santa Barbara Symphony company nor Seattle Rep company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seattle Rep company nor Santa Barbara Symphony company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Seattle Rep company nor Santa Barbara Symphony company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seattle Rep company employs more people globally than Santa Barbara Symphony company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seattle Rep nor Santa Barbara Symphony holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N