Comparison Overview

Seattle Art Museum

VS

Chrysler Museum of Art

Seattle Art Museum

1300 First Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

For over 90 years, the Seattle Art Museum (SAM) has been a leading visual arts institution in the Pacific Northwest. Through its three locations — the Seattle Art Museum in downtown Seattle, the Seattle Asian Art Museum in Volunteer Park, and the Olympic Sculpture Park on the downtown waterfront — SAM connects art to life through special exhibitions, educational programs, and installations drawn from its collection of approximately 25,000 objects from more than 140 cultures. SAM Social Media Policy: bit.ly/SAMSocialMediaPolicy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 353
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chrysler Museum of Art

One Memorial Place, Norfolk, VA, US, 23510
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1939 as the Norfolk Museum of Arts and Sciences, the Chrysler Museum of Art combines one of America's great fine arts museums, two significant historic houses and a Glass Studio, the only one of its kind on the East Coast. In addition to maintaining a distinguished permanent collection of over 30,000 objects spanning nearly 5,000 years of history, the Chrysler Museum offers a comprehensive program of changing exhibitions and education activities for visitors of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-art-museum.jpeg
Seattle Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chrysler-museum-of-art.jpeg
Chrysler Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seattle Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chrysler Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chrysler Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Seattle Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chrysler Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chrysler Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-art-museum.jpeg
Seattle Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chrysler-museum-of-art.jpeg
Chrysler Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Seattle Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chrysler Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chrysler Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seattle Art Museum company.

In the current year, Chrysler Museum of Art company and Seattle Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor Seattle Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor Seattle Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chrysler Museum of Art company nor Seattle Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seattle Art Museum company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Seattle Art Museum company nor Chrysler Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seattle Art Museum company employs more people globally than Chrysler Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seattle Art Museum nor Chrysler Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.