Comparison Overview

Seaport Graphics

VS

Enternet Control Systems

Seaport Graphics

12 Channel Street, Boston, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

At Seaport Graphics, we think visually. About your brand vision, our purpose. We bring your ideas to life through our innovative branded environments, digital imaging and visual merchandising printing solutions. As a full-service large format graphics printing and production house, we partner with world-class retail giants, corporations, museums, universities and organizations to masterfully transform visual marketing strategies into vibrant, high-impact displays that tell a brand story and engage customers. Our creative mindset is grounded in 33 years of experience in servicing thousands of clients from a variety of markets in New England and throughout the world. Ask any of them. They’ll tell you we’re experts at collaborating with clients to fulfill their vision -- creatively, thoroughly, and cost-effectively. We lead the way in utilizing cutting-edge digital printing technologies that produce images rich in color, detail, and scope. Our long-standing employees are respected for their expertise in graphics production and management. They excel at working with clients, designers, and architects to make their ideas as stunning as they envision them. Within our range of products, our SEG fabric light boxes illuminate commercial spaces while our window displays, wall murals, and multi-dimensional pieces create a sense of place at trade shows, events and corporate offices. For us, quality and service go hand-in-hand. Adept at graphics project management, we build on your concepts through the process, from our in-house production to on-site management to final installation. Your brand identity always at the forefront. The end result is an integrated experience that showcases everything from lighting and color to construction, placement and visibility.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Enternet Control Systems

21 Sequin Dr, Glastonbury, Connecticut, 06033, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

With over 30 years of experience, ECS offers a wide range of integration of digital print technology in-line for bindery, newspaper, wrappers, mail tables and comail control systems. Systems can include : - Selective pocket / hopper feeding and tracking - Multi-station inkjet customization and mailing - Integrated Vision technology for sig recognition, read and print, IMB/Barcode verification

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seaport-graphics.jpeg
Seaport Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enternet-control-systems.jpeg
Enternet Control Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seaport Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Enternet Control Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seaport Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enternet Control Systems in 2025.

Incident History — Seaport Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seaport Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Enternet Control Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enternet Control Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seaport-graphics.jpeg
Seaport Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enternet-control-systems.jpeg
Enternet Control Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Enternet Control Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seaport Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Enternet Control Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seaport Graphics company.

In the current year, Enternet Control Systems company and Seaport Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Enternet Control Systems company nor Seaport Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Enternet Control Systems company nor Seaport Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Enternet Control Systems company nor Seaport Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seaport Graphics company nor Enternet Control Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Seaport Graphics company nor Enternet Control Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Enternet Control Systems company employs more people globally than Seaport Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seaport Graphics nor Enternet Control Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L