Comparison Overview

Seal Shield™

VS

Unitech America

Seal Shield™

undefined, Orlando, FL, 32801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2006, Seal Shield introduced the industry’s first waterproof keyboard. Today Seal Shield is a world leader in the innovation, development, and manufacturing of specialized solutions that support a cleaner environment, including waterproof keyboards and mice, multilayer screen protectors, and UV-C Sanitization systems for portable devices & equipment. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, corporate institutions, governments, food services, education facilities, and vulnerable organizations are demanding these solutions. Our technologies offer products compatible with the most potent cleaners and disinfectants as well as mobile device management and UV-C sanitization compliance. When combined, Seal Shield products provide the most complete solution available for adequate cleaning in any organization.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unitech America

6182 Katella Ave, Cypress, CA, 90630, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Unitech is a global provider of data collection technologies. We develop a broad range of scanning and computing devices to help businesses achieve added efficiency and productivity. Our corporate commitment to customer service focuses on delivering technology solutions that continuously improve the way our customers work. Founded in 1979, Unitech began as a provider of custom microprocessor based automation systems for the Taiwanese market. Today, Unitech products and services are sold or licensed through a network of over a thousand partners throughout the world. Unitech currently maintains regional business units in North America, South America, Europe and Asia.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seal-shield.jpeg
Seal Shield™
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitechamerica.jpeg
Unitech America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Seal Shield™
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unitech America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seal Shield™ in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unitech America in 2025.

Incident History — Seal Shield™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seal Shield™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unitech America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unitech America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seal-shield.jpeg
Seal Shield™
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitechamerica.jpeg
Unitech America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Seal Shield™ company and Unitech America company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Unitech America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Seal Shield™ company.

In the current year, Unitech America company and Seal Shield™ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unitech America company nor Seal Shield™ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unitech America company nor Seal Shield™ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unitech America company nor Seal Shield™ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Seal Shield™ company nor Unitech America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Seal Shield™ company nor Unitech America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seal Shield™ company employs more people globally than Unitech America company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Seal Shield™ nor Unitech America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H