Comparison Overview

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.

VS

Legal Brands, Inc.

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.

400 Garden City Plaza, Garden City, New York, 11530, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since its founding more than 45 years ago, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. has become well known for its successful patent prosecution practice. It has an unmatched reputation for delivering value to its clients in procuring strong patents and for delivering the highest level of client service. Less well known is that Scully Scott has been successfully litigating patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright disputes throughout its history.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legal Brands, Inc.

430 West Main Street, Dothan, AL, 36301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our Mission To consolidate, manage, market and promote companies and law firms that are best in class in providing the highest quality services to lawyers, law firms and consumers. About Legal Brands Legal Brands, Inc. is a vertically focused legal management company with focus in two major divisions: Consumer Legal Brands and Law Firm Services Brands. Our Consumer Legal Brands Division provides front and back office support, management and marketing of lawyers, firms, legal projects and marketing campaigns that focus on lead generation, capture, quality and conversion. Within this division, we also provide law firm services that focus on consumer legal services and products, co-council and referral relationships with law firms, and law firm brands for national and regional brick and mortar law offices. Our Law Firm Services Brands Division owns, operates and manages over twenty legal associations, produces national publications and national legal conferences.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scully-scott-murphy-&-presser.jpeg
Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legal Brands, Inc.
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legal Brands, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legal Brands, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legal Brands, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scully-scott-murphy-&-presser.jpeg
Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-legal-pc.jpeg
Legal Brands, Inc.
Incidents

FAQ

Both Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company and Legal Brands, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Legal Brands, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company.

In the current year, Legal Brands, Inc. company and Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legal Brands, Inc. company nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legal Brands, Inc. company nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legal Brands, Inc. company nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company nor Legal Brands, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company nor Legal Brands, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company employs more people globally than Legal Brands, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. nor Legal Brands, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X