Comparison Overview

Scitor Veritas

VS

Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET)

Scitor Veritas

McKinney, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Scitor Veritas seeks to uncover the symptoms that keep business leaders up at night. Uncovering the root causes of pain allows us to design solutions that meet the needs of our clients versus "selling"​ clients a tactically driven band-aid. We are not the right consultant for all problems and we will not take on a client for the sake of revenue. However if our skills are in alignment with your problems we can bring a breadth of knowledge and experience to the fight.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET)

undefined, Washington, DC, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) at Georgetown’s Walsh School of Foreign Service is a research organization focused on studying the security impacts of emerging technologies, supporting academic work in security and technology studies and delivering nonpartisan analysis to the policy community. CSET is currently focusing on the effects of progress in AI, advanced computing and biotechnology. CSET aims to prepare a generation of policymakers, analysts and diplomats to address the challenges and opportunities of emerging technologies.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scitor-veritas.jpeg
Scitor Veritas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgetown-cset.jpeg
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Scitor Veritas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scitor Veritas in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) in 2025.

Incident History — Scitor Veritas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scitor Veritas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scitor-veritas.jpeg
Scitor Veritas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgetown-cset.jpeg
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Scitor Veritas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Scitor Veritas company.

In the current year, Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company and Scitor Veritas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company nor Scitor Veritas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company nor Scitor Veritas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company nor Scitor Veritas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Scitor Veritas company nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Scitor Veritas company nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) company employs more people globally than Scitor Veritas company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Scitor Veritas nor Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X