Comparison Overview

Association of Science and Technology Centers

VS

Erfgoed Zeeland

Association of Science and Technology Centers

2000 Florida Ave NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, US, 20009
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Association of Science and Technology Centers (ASTC) is a network of nearly 700 science and technology centers and museums, and allied organizations, engaging more than 110 million people annually across North America and in almost 50 countries. With its members and partners, ASTC works towards a vision of increased understanding of—and engagement with—science and technology among all people. Founded in 1973, ASTC provides a collective voice, professional support, and programming opportunities for science centers, museums, and related institutions. Through strategic alliances and global partnerships, ASTC's goal is to increase awareness of the valuable contributions its members make to their communities and the field of informal STEM learning and public engagement in science.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Erfgoed Zeeland

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

De Stichting Cultureel Erfgoed Zeeland (SCEZ) is het aanspreekpunt en kenniscentrum voor het erfgoed in Zeeland. De SCEZ informeert en adviseert over het erfgoed in Zeeland en maakt het beleefbaar voor een breed publiek. Dit alles gebeurt onder het motto 'Erfgoed boeit en erfgoed bindt'. Erfgoed boeit, omdat het over de eigen omgeving en het eigen verleden gaat. De verhalen daarover boeien. Tegelijkertijd bindt erfgoed. Het bindt mensen aan hun omgeving en aan elkaar. Erfgoed schept een band. De SCEZ beschikt over een breed netwerk binnen en buiten de provincie Zeeland. Zij richt zich in haar doen en laten op alle geledingen van de maatschappij. Erfgoed in Zeeland heeft vele belanghebbenden: het Rijk en de Provincie Zeeland, gemeenten en waterschappen, erfgoedorganisaties, amateurs en vrijwilligers, burgers en monumenteigenaren. De SCEZ geeft op praktische wijze uitvoering aan het provinciaal beleid op het terrein van cultureel erfgoed. Zij is de belangrijkste samenwerkingspartner van de Provincie Zeeland bij het realiseren van de provinciale ambities op dit gebied: een zo gevarieerd en zo gespreid mogelijke cultuurparticipatie en versterking van de culturele factor in de samenleving. De SCEZ stelt haar werkzaamheden hierbij geheel ten dienste van het duurzaam behoud en de duurzame ontwikkeling van het erfgoed in al zijn verschijningsvormen, materieel zowel als immaterieel. De werkvelden zijn archeologie, cultuurhistorie, monumenten, musea, streektalen, volkscultuur en erfgoededucatie. De Monumentenwacht Zeeland maakt deel uit van de organisatie. Stichting Cultureel Erfgoed Zeeland Looierssingel 2, 4331 NK Middelburg Telefoon: (0118) 670 870

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sciencecenters.jpeg
Association of Science and Technology Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-cultureel-erfgoed-zeeland.jpeg
Erfgoed Zeeland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association of Science and Technology Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Erfgoed Zeeland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association of Science and Technology Centers in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Erfgoed Zeeland in 2025.

Incident History — Association of Science and Technology Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association of Science and Technology Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Erfgoed Zeeland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Erfgoed Zeeland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sciencecenters.jpeg
Association of Science and Technology Centers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-cultureel-erfgoed-zeeland.jpeg
Erfgoed Zeeland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Erfgoed Zeeland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Association of Science and Technology Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Erfgoed Zeeland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Association of Science and Technology Centers company.

In the current year, Erfgoed Zeeland company and Association of Science and Technology Centers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Erfgoed Zeeland company nor Association of Science and Technology Centers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Erfgoed Zeeland company nor Association of Science and Technology Centers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Erfgoed Zeeland company nor Association of Science and Technology Centers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers company nor Erfgoed Zeeland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers company nor Erfgoed Zeeland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Association of Science and Technology Centers company employs more people globally than Erfgoed Zeeland company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Erfgoed Zeeland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X