Comparison Overview

Association of Science and Technology Centers

VS

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum

Association of Science and Technology Centers

2000 Florida Ave NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, US, 20009
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Association of Science and Technology Centers (ASTC) is a network of nearly 700 science and technology centers and museums, and allied organizations, engaging more than 110 million people annually across North America and in almost 50 countries. With its members and partners, ASTC works towards a vision of increased understanding of—and engagement with—science and technology among all people. Founded in 1973, ASTC provides a collective voice, professional support, and programming opportunities for science centers, museums, and related institutions. Through strategic alliances and global partnerships, ASTC's goal is to increase awareness of the valuable contributions its members make to their communities and the field of informal STEM learning and public engagement in science.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum

3696 Main Street, Riverside, CA, 92501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Mission Inn Foundation preserves, interprets, and promotes the cultural heritage of the Mission Inn, Riverside, and the surrounding southern California communities through its museum services, educational programs, and outreach activities.Each year, the Mission Inn Foundation reaches out beyond the walls of the National Historic Landmark Mission Inn to bring innovative enrichment programs to students in the local schools. Located at the corner of Main Street and Mission Inn Avenue, the Mission Inn Museum features exhibitions examining the hotel’s history and lasting impacts on the Riverside community and beyond. The Mission Inn Museum is also the starting point for all docent-led Mission Inn tours and features an extensive museum store with one of a kind products from local artists, unique Mission Inn souvenirs, in addition to a wide selection of books on Mission Inn and local history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sciencecenters.jpeg
Association of Science and Technology Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-inn-foundation.jpeg
Mission Inn Foundation and Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Association of Science and Technology Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mission Inn Foundation and Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association of Science and Technology Centers in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mission Inn Foundation and Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Association of Science and Technology Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association of Science and Technology Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mission Inn Foundation and Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sciencecenters.jpeg
Association of Science and Technology Centers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-inn-foundation.jpeg
Mission Inn Foundation and Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Association of Science and Technology Centers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Association of Science and Technology Centers company.

In the current year, Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company and Association of Science and Technology Centers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company nor Association of Science and Technology Centers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company nor Association of Science and Technology Centers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company nor Association of Science and Technology Centers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers company nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers company nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Association of Science and Technology Centers company employs more people globally than Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Association of Science and Technology Centers nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X