Comparison Overview

Science Museum of Minnesota

VS

Larz Anderson Auto Museum

Science Museum of Minnesota

120 W Kellogg Blvd, Saint Paul, MN, 55102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smm.org

We’re here to turn on the science. Through education, in-person experiences, online learning, traveling exhibits, and community partnerships, the Science Museum of Minnesota is dedicated to collaborating with our community to create a world where everyone has the power to use science to make lives better. With the help of our visitors, volunteers, staff, and community partners, we’re using science to figure out how our world works. Between our interactive exhibits, collection with over two million objects, and continuous scientific research, we believe there’s always something new to discover.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 391
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Larz Anderson Auto Museum

15 NEWTON ST, Brookline, Massachusetts 02445, us
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://larzanderson.org

The Larz Anderson Auto Museum is home to "America’s Oldest Car Collection". For more than eighty-five years the Larz Anderson Auto Museum has been supporting the community through a variety of educational programs, exhibits, and lectures. Today the Museum's primary goal is its continued support of the community through educational outreach and the preservation of our permanent collection of early automobiles. The Larz Anderson Auto Museum hopes to serve as a resource for your automotive and cultural interests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/science-museum-of-minnesota.jpeg
Science Museum of Minnesota
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larz-anderson-auto-museum.jpeg
Larz Anderson Auto Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Science Museum of Minnesota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Larz Anderson Auto Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Science Museum of Minnesota in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larz Anderson Auto Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Science Museum of Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Science Museum of Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Larz Anderson Auto Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larz Anderson Auto Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/science-museum-of-minnesota.jpeg
Science Museum of Minnesota
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larz-anderson-auto-museum.jpeg
Larz Anderson Auto Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Science Museum of Minnesota company and Larz Anderson Auto Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Larz Anderson Auto Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Science Museum of Minnesota company.

In the current year, Larz Anderson Auto Museum company and Science Museum of Minnesota company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum company nor Science Museum of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum company nor Science Museum of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Larz Anderson Auto Museum company nor Science Museum of Minnesota company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota company nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota company nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Science Museum of Minnesota company employs more people globally than Larz Anderson Auto Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Science Museum of Minnesota nor Larz Anderson Auto Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References