Comparison Overview

Schrager Legal PC

VS

New England Innocence Project

Schrager Legal PC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Schrager Legal is a business and intellectual property law firm with offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Los Angeles, California. At Schrager Legal, we pride ourselves on delivering a premier work product to our clients while providing a collaborative work environment based on collegiality, ingenuity and adaptability. We are easy to work with, yet determined advocates for our clients. We maintain relationships with industry specialists and a network of attorneys throughout the US and Canada to provide answers for our clients, no matter what the challenge is or where the opportunity arises. Our attorneys possess formidable experience in the legal professional, along with rich backgrounds in business, technology, and entertainment. We utilize these backgrounds to connect with our clients while finding common sense solutions to legal challenges in each of the industries we serve. At Schrager Legal, we strive to exceed our client’s expectations at every measure.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New England Innocence Project

1035 Cambridge St, 28A, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, 02141
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The New England Innocence Project (NEIP) is an independent social justice non-profit committed to correcting and preventing the wrongful convictions in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, Connecticut and Maine. Through pro bono legal and investigative services, education, systemic reform efforts, and support as exonerees rebuild their lives, NEIP is devoted to fighting injustice within the criminal legal system. The NEIP team has more than 30 years of local litigation experience and relationships and accepts qualifying DNA and non-DNA cases in our six state territory. Visit New England Innocence Project at NewEnglandInnocence.org for more information, to become a sponsor, or to make a donation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newenglandinnocence.jpeg
New England Innocence Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schrager Legal PC
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New England Innocence Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schrager Legal PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New England Innocence Project in 2025.

Incident History — Schrager Legal PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schrager Legal PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New England Innocence Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New England Innocence Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schrager-legal-pc.jpeg
Schrager Legal PC
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newenglandinnocence.jpeg
New England Innocence Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schrager Legal PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New England Innocence Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New England Innocence Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schrager Legal PC company.

In the current year, New England Innocence Project company and Schrager Legal PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New England Innocence Project company nor Schrager Legal PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New England Innocence Project company nor Schrager Legal PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New England Innocence Project company nor Schrager Legal PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schrager Legal PC company nor New England Innocence Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Schrager Legal PC company nor New England Innocence Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New England Innocence Project company employs more people globally than Schrager Legal PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schrager Legal PC nor New England Innocence Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X