Comparison Overview

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

VS

Cobb County School District

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)

14033 92 Avenue, Surrey, BC, CA, V3V0B7
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Surrey Schools (School District #36) operates schools in Surrey and White Rock, British Columbia. It is the largest school district in British Columbia with approximately 77,000 students. Surrey Schools includes 103 elementary schools, 21 secondary schools, five student learning centres, three adult education centres and a variety of other programs serving a wide range of specific student needs. The district is Surrey's largest employer with about 12,000+ employees, including more than 6,000 teachers.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 3,134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Cobb County School District

514 Glover Street, Marietta, GA, US, 30060
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT is a public school system with administrative offices based at 514 Glover St., Marietta, GA 30060. Cobb County School District (CCSD) is the second largest school system in Georgia. CCSD is responsible for educating more than 112,000 students in a diverse, constantly changing suburban environment. CCSD is made up of 113 schools and employs over 18,000 employees, making it the largest employer in Cobb County, GA. Our mission is Creating and Supporting Pathways for Success. Our vision is One Team, One Goal: Student Success.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 10,189
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/school-district-36-surrey-.jpeg
Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobbschools.jpeg
Cobb County School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cobb County School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cobb County School District in 2025.

Incident History — Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cobb County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cobb County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/school-district-36-surrey-.jpeg
Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey)
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Clerical Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobbschools.jpeg
Cobb County School District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cobb County School District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cobb County School District company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cobb County School District company and Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cobb County School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company nor Cobb County School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cobb County School District company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company.

Cobb County School District company employs more people globally than Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Surrey Schools (School District #36 Surrey) nor Cobb County School District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N