Comparison Overview

Schmoyer Reinhard LLP

VS

Palm Beach County Bar Association

Schmoyer Reinhard LLP

8000 IH 10 West, San Antonio, TX, 78230, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Schmoyer Reinhard LLP advises and represents businesses throughout the United States, with an emphasis on labor and employment law, construction litigation, and business litigation. We represent and counsel private and public entities of all sizes, ranging from Fortune 50 corporations to emerging start-ups. Our clients hail from a number of different industries, including insurance, construction, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, manufacturing, transportation, energy, and food service. Schmoyer Reinhard is certified as a Women’s Business Enterprise (WBE) by the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC). In addition, we are designated as a Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) by the Texas Building and Procurement Commission (TBPC) and are certified as a Small Business Enterprise by the South Central Texas Regional Certification Agency. 1)Named a 2022 Tier 1 Metropolitan "Best Law Firm"​ by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® in three practice areas including: *Employment Law – Management *Labor Law – Management *Litigation – Labor & Employment 2)Named an “Band 4 Law Firm” in Chambers USA, Labor & Employment – Texas in 2016 - 2021 3)Ranked in top 20% of employment litigation law firms in BTI Litigation Outlook 2018 Report 4)Named to the Honor Roll in the BTI Brand Elite 2018: Client Perceptions of the Best-Branded Law Firms Report 5)Named to the Honor Roll of Recommended Firms in Utilities - Top 10% of all law firms in the BTI Industry Power 6)Rankings 2017: The Law Firms with the Best Client Relationships in 18 Industries Report 7)Named to the BTI Client Service A‐Team 2017 for client service 8)Received AV® Preeminent rating, the highest possible rating from Martindale‐Hubbell®, based on legal ability and general ethical standards

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Palm Beach County Bar Association

1507 BELVEDERE RD, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406, us
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Palm Beach County Bar Association (PBCBA), founded in 1922, is a voluntary professional association of 2,600 lawyers & judges in Palm Beach County. The mission of the PBCBA is to serve its members, foster professionalism and enhance the public’s understanding and awareness of the legal system. We are very active in providing numerous public service activities and giving back to the community. We encourage all attorneys to join the PBCBA to take advantage of the many benefits provided and to get involved in the many committees and networking opportunities offered. The PBCBA offers a variety of services to the legal community & the general public, such as conducting a Lawyer Referral Service to assist with finding qualified legal counsel. Also, the PBCBA conducts membership meetings, committee meetings, special events & continuing education programs. Our monthly newsletter, the Bulletin, is published to educate & inform members about relevant legal issues. We also send out weekly informational eNewsletters that keep the legal community updated on recent Court news and other events taking place in our legal community.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmoyer-reinhard-llp.jpeg
Schmoyer Reinhard LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palm-beach-county-bar-association.jpeg
Palm Beach County Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schmoyer Reinhard LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Palm Beach County Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schmoyer Reinhard LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palm Beach County Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — Schmoyer Reinhard LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schmoyer Reinhard LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Palm Beach County Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palm Beach County Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmoyer-reinhard-llp.jpeg
Schmoyer Reinhard LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palm-beach-county-bar-association.jpeg
Palm Beach County Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Palm Beach County Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Palm Beach County Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company.

In the current year, Palm Beach County Bar Association company and Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Palm Beach County Bar Association company nor Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Palm Beach County Bar Association company nor Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Palm Beach County Bar Association company nor Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company nor Palm Beach County Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company nor Palm Beach County Bar Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Schmoyer Reinhard LLP company employs more people globally than Palm Beach County Bar Association company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schmoyer Reinhard LLP nor Palm Beach County Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X