Comparison Overview

Schmitz Press

VS

Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions

Schmitz Press

37 Loveton Circle, Sparks-Glencoe, 21152, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://schmitzpress.net

Family-owned and -operated since its founding in Baltimore in 1937, Schmitz Press is a printing company with a long tradition of excellence. Our founder, E. John Schmitz, began the business with a masterful knowledge of printing technology and a very simple sales strategy, “Treat the customer right.” The printing industry and its technology have undergone incredible changes since 1937 and so have we, but our founding strengths remain the same: a mastery of technology and a sincere desire to please each customer. We are a family business and it shows: strong, long-term relationships – with customers, suppliers, and employees – are central to our mission.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions

5818 Rocky Point Dr., San Antonio, TX, 78249, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.thompsonprintsolutions.com

Since 1964, Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions has been providing complete commercial printing packages with full support for your business. We assist you from the very beginning of your project, keep you within your budget, and complete and deliver a quality product. Our 17,000 square foot building houses five printing presses, including 5- and 4-color machines, digital presses, full bindery, large-format printing, aqueous and UV coaters, a complete graphic design and pre-press department, and more. Visit us on our Facebook page to take advantage of offers, learn more about our services and product offerings and to view some of our portfolio of work: http://www.facebook.com/thompsonprint

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmitzpress.jpeg
Schmitz Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thompson-print-and-mailing-solutions.jpeg
Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schmitz Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schmitz Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Schmitz Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schmitz Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmitzpress.jpeg
Schmitz Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thompson-print-and-mailing-solutions.jpeg
Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schmitz Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schmitz Press company.

In the current year, Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company and Schmitz Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company nor Schmitz Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company nor Schmitz Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company nor Schmitz Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schmitz Press company nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Schmitz Press company nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions company employs more people globally than Schmitz Press company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Thompson Print & Mailing Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References