Comparison Overview

Schmitz Press

VS

Pilot Italia

Schmitz Press

37 Loveton Circle, Sparks-Glencoe, 21152, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Family-owned and -operated since its founding in Baltimore in 1937, Schmitz Press is a printing company with a long tradition of excellence. Our founder, E. John Schmitz, began the business with a masterful knowledge of printing technology and a very simple sales strategy, “Treat the customer right.” The printing industry and its technology have undergone incredible changes since 1937 and so have we, but our founding strengths remain the same: a mastery of technology and a sincere desire to please each customer. We are a family business and it shows: strong, long-term relationships – with customers, suppliers, and employees – are central to our mission.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pilot Italia

via lanzi 42, Cornate d'​ Adda, 20872, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Pilot Italia spa is a self-adhesives labels and film of primary importance on the European market when it comes to studying and manufacturing self-adhesive packaging solutions. The company's printing equipment is the only one of its kind in Italy and it recently transferred its production over to the new plant in Cornate d'Adda. The equipment from the two existing poles in Usmate Velate and Merate has been pooled together in this new production plant so as to enable the company to respond to all industry requirements in the most efficient and financially viable way: from white labels to those printed in 10 colours. A new competitive capacity that is all thanks to the application of lean manufacturing techniques which mean that savings can be made whilst both maintaining and stepping-up Pilot Italia's level of quality.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmitzpress.jpeg
Schmitz Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pilot-italia.jpeg
Pilot Italia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schmitz Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pilot Italia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schmitz Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilot Italia in 2025.

Incident History — Schmitz Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schmitz Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pilot Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilot Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmitzpress.jpeg
Schmitz Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pilot-italia.jpeg
Pilot Italia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schmitz Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pilot Italia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pilot Italia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schmitz Press company.

In the current year, Pilot Italia company and Schmitz Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pilot Italia company nor Schmitz Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pilot Italia company nor Schmitz Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pilot Italia company nor Schmitz Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schmitz Press company nor Pilot Italia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Schmitz Press company nor Pilot Italia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pilot Italia company employs more people globally than Schmitz Press company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schmitz Press nor Pilot Italia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N