Comparison Overview

Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts

VS

PC Communications

Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts

22 Century Hill Drive, Latham, New York, 12110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

We focus exclusively on the practice of intellectual property law, and cover all components related to Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Unfair Competition, Computer and Trade Secret Law. By specializing in acquiring, protecting and managing ideas and innovations, the patent attorneys of Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts stay abreast of all new rules and regulations governing the protection of unique ideas. This allows us to skillfully guide our clients through the legal corridors of intellectual property law, thus avoiding or removing obstacles and pitfalls they might encounter along the way. The patent lawyers, support staff, and industry experts of Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts possess extensive training and experience in a broad range of technical fields, with many of our attorneys holding scientific or technology-related undergraduate or graduate degrees. Our patent attorneys and technical specialists represent virtually every major industry or growing field of research. Offices in Arizona, California, Idaho, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington D.C.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PC Communications

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We provide companies with the necessary resources to effectively utilize the ever-changing computer technology installed in their workplace. Continually educating individuals and enhancing their computer skills will increase productivity. We offer a wide variety of services designed to meet the needs of your firm or organization, including Training, Migration Consulting, Template Creation and Macro Programming, Helpdesk and Deskside Support, and Courseware Development.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmeiser-olsen-&-watts.jpeg
Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PC Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PC Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PC Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PC Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PC Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schmeiser-olsen-&-watts.jpeg
Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
PC Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PC Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PC Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company.

In the current year, PC Communications company and Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PC Communications company nor Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PC Communications company nor Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PC Communications company nor Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company nor PC Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company nor PC Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts company employs more people globally than PC Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts nor PC Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X