Comparison Overview

Schindler Group

VS

Former Stork B.V.

Schindler Group

Schindler Management, Zugerstrasse 13, Ebikon, CH, 6030
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

The Schindler Group is a leading manufacturer and provider of related services for elevators, escalators, and moving walkways. Founded in 1874 in Switzerland, our company is at the forefront of industry innovation, working on pushing the boundaries of technological engineering, while having a strong focus on safety, comfort, efficiency and reliability. Moving more than two billion people each day, our products can be found in many well-known buildings throughout the globe, including office and residential buildings, airports, shopping centers/retail establishments and specialty buildings. We’re a leading employer in the industry, with over 69’000 engaged employees enabling mobility within the urban world. We have a network of over 1000 branch offices in over 100 countries, as well as production sites and research and development facilities in the US, Brazil, Europe, China and India. At Schindler, our mission is to keep the world moving. We Elevate… Our World

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 29,563
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Former Stork B.V.

Van Deventerlaan 121 Utrecht, 3528 AG, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Stork B.V. was an international group of companies active in aerospace, technical services, food, and printing machinery. Since 2008 Stork is delisted from the Amsterdam Stock Exchange and now privately held . As of January 1, 2013 - Fokker Technologies and Stork Technical Services have their own independent governance structures. Since January 2014, Stork Technical Services rebranded its name back to Stork again. Stork B.V. limits its role to shareholder of both companies. Stork: www.stork.com Fokker Technologies: www.fokker.com Stork Food Systems: www.marel.com Stork Prints: www.spgprints.com Stork Material Technology: www.element.com

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindler-group.jpeg
Schindler Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/former-stork-bv.jpeg
Former Stork B.V.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schindler Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Former Stork B.V.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindler Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Former Stork B.V. in 2025.

Incident History — Schindler Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindler Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Former Stork B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Former Stork B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindler-group.jpeg
Schindler Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/former-stork-bv.jpeg
Former Stork B.V.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schindler Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Former Stork B.V. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Former Stork B.V. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schindler Group company.

In the current year, Former Stork B.V. company and Schindler Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Former Stork B.V. company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Former Stork B.V. company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Former Stork B.V. company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schindler Group company nor Former Stork B.V. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Schindler Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Former Stork B.V. company.

Schindler Group company employs more people globally than Former Stork B.V. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Former Stork B.V. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H